Chomps ``` vs Chomps Smoky BBQ Beef
Chomps ``` edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Chomps ``` scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (12g vs 10g), a lighter calorie hit (80 vs 100), more protein per 100 calories (15.0g vs 10.0g).
Full side-by-side of protein, calories, macros, and protein density for Chomps ``` and Chomps Smoky BBQ Beef below.
Chomps
Wins on: Protein, Calories, Sodium, Protein per 100 cal
Protein
12g
Calories
80
Protein per 100 cal
15.0g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 12g vs 10g.
- Lower calorie load: 80 calories vs 100.
- Better protein density: 15.0g protein per 100 calories.
Cons
- Weaker review score: 3.5 vs 4.6.
Chomps
Protein
10g
Calories
100
Protein per 100 cal
10.0g
Pros
- Stronger shopper rating: 4.6 vs 3.5.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 10g vs 12g.
- Higher calorie count: 100 vs 80.
| Metric | Chomps ``` | Chomps Smoky BBQ Beef |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 12gBest | 10g |
| Calories | 80Best | 100 |
| Sugar | 0g | 0g |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g |
| Sodium | 370mgBest | — |
| Carbs | 0g | 0g |
| Fat | 5g | 5g |
| Protein per 100 cal | 15.0gBest | 10.0g |
“Healthier” depends on your goal — here’s the real winner on every number we track, so two people with different priorities can both get the right answer.
- Protein: Chomps ``` wins, 12g vs 10g.
- Calories: Chomps ``` wins, 80 vs 100.
- Sugar: it's a real tie — both at 0g.
- Fiber: it's a real tie — both at 0g.
- Sodium: Chomps ``` wins, 370mg vs —.
- Carbs: it's a real tie — both at 0g.
- Fat: it's a real tie — both at 5g.
- Protein per 100 cal: Chomps ``` wins, 15.0g vs 10.0g.
Chomps ``` edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend.
Chomps ``` scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (12g vs 10g), a lighter calorie hit (80 vs 100), more protein per 100 calories (15.0g vs 10.0g). This blend won’t match your priorities if sugar, carbs, or diet fit matter more to you than protein, calories, and rating.
Frequently Asked Questions
Chomps ``` has more protein per serving: 12g versus 10g.
Chomps ``` is the lighter option at 80 calories, compared with 100 calories for the alternative.
Chomps ``` is the more protein-dense pick at about 15.0g of protein per 100 calories.
"Healthier" depends on your goal: Chomps ``` has more protein (12g vs 10g); Chomps ``` is lower in calories (80 vs 100). Neither is objectively the "healthiest" for everyone — see the pick-by-priority breakdown above, or try our free AI Snack Finder to get matched to your specific goal.
Chomps ``` edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Chomps ``` scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (12g vs 10g), a lighter calorie hit (80 vs 100), more protein per 100 calories (15.0g vs 10.0g). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.
Get weekly protein snack picks
Data-ranked comparisons and new picks. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.