Product Comparison

Wildebrands Classic Cheddar vs Wildebrands Sea Salt & Vinegar

Compare protein, calories, price, and overall value for Wildebrands Classic Cheddar and Wildebrands Sea Salt & Vinegar before you buy.

Wildebrands

Classic Cheddar
Verdict Winner
Classic Cheddar

Protein

12g

Calories

140

Price

Protein per $1

g

protein chips

Pros

  • More protein per serving: 12g vs 10g.
  • Lower calorie load: 140 calories vs 160.

Cons

  • Weaker review score: 0.0 vs 5.0.
View Full Product Details

Wildebrands

Sea Salt & Vinegar
Sea Salt & Vinegar

Protein

10g

Calories

160

Price

$99.00

Protein per $1

0.1g

protein chips5.0

Pros

  • Stronger shopper rating: 5.0 vs 0.0.

Cons

  • Less protein per serving: 10g vs 12g.
  • Higher calorie count: 160 vs 140.
View Full Product Details
Side-by-Side Breakdown
MetricWildebrands Classic CheddarWildebrands Sea Salt & Vinegar
Protein12gBest10g
Calories140Best160
Carbs
Fat
Price$99.00Best
Protein per $10.1gBest
Verdict

Wildebrands Classic Cheddar is the stronger overall pick in this matchup.

Wildebrands Classic Cheddar wins here because it offers more protein per serving (12g vs 10g), a lighter calorie hit (140 vs 160).

Choose Wildebrands Classic Cheddar if you care more about more protein per serving: 12g vs 10g.

Choose Wildebrands Sea Salt & Vinegar if you care more about stronger shopper rating: 5.0 vs 0.0.

Frequently Asked Questions

Wildebrands Classic Cheddar vs Wildebrands Sea Salt & Vinegar: which has more protein?

Wildebrands Classic Cheddar has more protein per serving: 12g versus 10g.

Which option is better for a lower-calorie snack?

Wildebrands Classic Cheddar is the lighter option at 140 calories, compared with 160 calories for the alternative.

Which snack gives better protein value for the price?

Price-per-protein value is unclear because one of these products is missing pricing data.

What is the final verdict in this comparison?

Wildebrands Classic Cheddar is the stronger overall pick in this matchup. Wildebrands Classic Cheddar wins here because it offers more protein per serving (12g vs 10g), a lighter calorie hit (140 vs 160). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.