Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH vs TRUBAR Cocoa for Coconuts TRUBAR Nutrition and Protein Bar
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (16g vs 12g), more protein per 100 calories (8.4g vs 6.3g).
Full side-by-side of protein, calories, macros, and protein density for Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH and TRUBAR Cocoa for Coconuts TRUBAR Nutrition and Protein Bar below.
Robert Irvine's
Wins on: Protein, Sugar, Sodium, Carbs, Fat, Protein per 100 cal
Protein
16g
Calories
190
Protein per 100 cal
8.4g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 16g vs 12g.
- Better protein density: 8.4g protein per 100 calories.
Cons
- Weaker review score: 4.5 vs 4.7.
TRUBAR
Wins on: Fiber
Protein
12g
Calories
190
Protein per 100 cal
6.3g
Pros
- Stronger shopper rating: 4.7 vs 4.5.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 12g vs 16g.
- Lower protein density than Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH (6.3g vs 8.4g protein per 100 calories).
| Metric | Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH | TRUBAR Cocoa for Coconuts TRUBAR Nutrition and Protein Bar |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 16gBest | 12g |
| Calories | 190 | 190 |
| Sugar | 3gBest | 8g |
| Fiber | 0g | 2gBest |
| Sodium | 0.12mgBest | — |
| Carbs | 14gBest | 15g |
| Fat | 10gBest | 11g |
| Protein per 100 cal | 8.4gBest | 6.3g |
“Healthier” depends on your goal — here’s the real winner on every number we track, so two people with different priorities can both get the right answer.
- Protein: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 16g vs 12g.
- Calories: it's a real tie — both at 190.
- Sugar: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 3g vs 8g.
- Fiber: TRUBAR Cocoa for Coconuts TRUBAR Nutrition and Protein Bar wins, 2g vs 0g.
- Sodium: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 0.12mg vs —.
- Carbs: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 14g vs 15g.
- Fat: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 10g vs 11g.
- Protein per 100 cal: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 8.4g vs 6.3g.
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend.
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (16g vs 12g), more protein per 100 calories (8.4g vs 6.3g). This blend won’t match your priorities if sugar, carbs, or diet fit matter more to you than protein, calories, and rating.
Frequently Asked Questions
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH has more protein per serving: 16g versus 12g.
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH and TRUBAR Cocoa for Coconuts TRUBAR Nutrition and Protein Bar are tied at 190 calories per serving.
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH is the more protein-dense pick at about 8.4g of protein per 100 calories.
"Healthier" depends on your goal: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH has more protein (16g vs 12g); Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH has less sugar (3g vs 8g). Neither is objectively the "healthiest" for everyone — see the pick-by-priority breakdown above, or try our free AI Snack Finder to get matched to your specific goal.
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (16g vs 12g), more protein per 100 calories (8.4g vs 6.3g). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.
Get weekly protein snack picks
Data-ranked comparisons and new picks. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.