Atkins Bars & Snacks vs Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (16g vs 12g), a lighter calorie hit (190 vs 200), more protein per 100 calories (8.4g vs 6.0g).
Full side-by-side of protein, calories, macros, and protein density for Atkins Bars & Snacks and Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH below.
Atkins
Wins on: Sugar, Fiber
Protein
12g
Calories
200
Protein per 100 cal
6.0g
Pros
- Stronger shopper rating: 4.7 vs 4.5.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 12g vs 16g.
- Higher calorie count: 200 vs 190.
Robert Irvine's
Wins on: Protein, Calories, Sodium, Carbs, Protein per 100 cal
Protein
16g
Calories
190
Protein per 100 cal
8.4g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 16g vs 12g.
- Lower calorie load: 190 calories vs 200.
- Better protein density: 8.4g protein per 100 calories.
Cons
- Weaker review score: 4.5 vs 4.7.
| Metric | Atkins Bars & Snacks | Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 12g | 16gBest |
| Calories | 200 | 190Best |
| Sugar | 2gBest | 3g |
| Fiber | 5gBest | 0g |
| Sodium | 150mg | 0.12mgBest |
| Carbs | 15g | 14gBest |
| Fat | 10g | 10g |
| Protein per 100 cal | 6.0g | 8.4gBest |
“Healthier” depends on your goal — here’s the real winner on every number we track, so two people with different priorities can both get the right answer.
- Protein: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 16g vs 12g.
- Calories: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 190 vs 200.
- Sugar: Atkins Bars & Snacks wins, 2g vs 3g.
- Fiber: Atkins Bars & Snacks wins, 5g vs 0g.
- Sodium: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 0.12mg vs 150mg.
- Carbs: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 14g vs 15g.
- Fat: it's a real tie — both at 10g.
- Protein per 100 cal: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 8.4g vs 6.0g.
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend.
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (16g vs 12g), a lighter calorie hit (190 vs 200), more protein per 100 calories (8.4g vs 6.0g). This blend won’t match your priorities if sugar, carbs, or diet fit matter more to you than protein, calories, and rating.
Frequently Asked Questions
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH has more protein per serving: 16g versus 12g.
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH is the lighter option at 190 calories, compared with 200 calories for the alternative.
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH is the more protein-dense pick at about 8.4g of protein per 100 calories.
"Healthier" depends on your goal: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH has more protein (16g vs 12g); Atkins Bars & Snacks has less sugar (2g vs 3g); Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH is lower in calories (190 vs 200). Neither is objectively the "healthiest" for everyone — see the pick-by-priority breakdown above, or try our free AI Snack Finder to get matched to your specific goal.
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (16g vs 12g), a lighter calorie hit (190 vs 200), more protein per 100 calories (8.4g vs 6.0g). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.
Get weekly protein snack picks
Data-ranked comparisons and new picks. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.