No Cow Chocolate Salted Caramel Protein Bars vs Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH
No Cow Chocolate Salted Caramel Protein Bars edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. No Cow Chocolate Salted Caramel Protein Bars scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g), more protein per 100 calories (10.0g vs 8.4g).
Full side-by-side of protein, calories, macros, and protein density for No Cow Chocolate Salted Caramel Protein Bars and Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH below.
No Cow
Wins on: Protein, Fiber, Fat, Protein per 100 cal
Protein
20g
Calories
200
Protein per 100 cal
10.0g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 20g vs 16g.
- Better protein density: 10.0g protein per 100 calories.
Cons
- Higher calorie count: 200 vs 190.
- Weaker review score: 3.5 vs 4.6.
Robert Irvine's
Wins on: Calories, Sodium, Carbs
Protein
16g
Calories
190
Protein per 100 cal
8.4g
Pros
- Lower calorie load: 190 calories vs 200.
- Stronger shopper rating: 4.6 vs 3.5.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 16g vs 20g.
- Lower protein density than No Cow Chocolate Salted Caramel Protein Bars (8.4g vs 10.0g protein per 100 calories).
| Metric | No Cow Chocolate Salted Caramel Protein Bars | Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 20gBest | 16g |
| Calories | 200 | 190Best |
| Sugar | 3g | 3g |
| Fiber | 7gBest | 0g |
| Sodium | 150mg | 0.12mgBest |
| Carbs | 25g | 14gBest |
| Fat | 6gBest | 10g |
| Protein per 100 cal | 10.0gBest | 8.4g |
“Healthier” depends on your goal — here’s the real winner on every number we track, so two people with different priorities can both get the right answer.
- Protein: No Cow Chocolate Salted Caramel Protein Bars wins, 20g vs 16g.
- Calories: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 190 vs 200.
- Sugar: it's a real tie — both at 3g.
- Fiber: No Cow Chocolate Salted Caramel Protein Bars wins, 7g vs 0g.
- Sodium: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 0.12mg vs 150mg.
- Carbs: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 14g vs 25g.
- Fat: No Cow Chocolate Salted Caramel Protein Bars wins, 6g vs 10g.
- Protein per 100 cal: No Cow Chocolate Salted Caramel Protein Bars wins, 10.0g vs 8.4g.
No Cow Chocolate Salted Caramel Protein Bars edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend.
No Cow Chocolate Salted Caramel Protein Bars scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g), more protein per 100 calories (10.0g vs 8.4g). This blend won’t match your priorities if sugar, carbs, or diet fit matter more to you than protein, calories, and rating.
Frequently Asked Questions
No Cow Chocolate Salted Caramel Protein Bars has more protein per serving: 20g versus 16g.
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH is the lighter option at 190 calories, compared with 200 calories for the alternative.
No Cow Chocolate Salted Caramel Protein Bars is the more protein-dense pick at about 10.0g of protein per 100 calories.
"Healthier" depends on your goal: No Cow Chocolate Salted Caramel Protein Bars has more protein (20g vs 16g); Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH is lower in calories (190 vs 200). Neither is objectively the "healthiest" for everyone — see the pick-by-priority breakdown above, or try our free AI Snack Finder to get matched to your specific goal.
No Cow Chocolate Salted Caramel Protein Bars edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. No Cow Chocolate Salted Caramel Protein Bars scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g), more protein per 100 calories (10.0g vs 8.4g). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.
Get weekly protein snack picks
Data-ranked comparisons and new picks. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.