Product Comparison

No Cow Chocolate Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bar vs Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH

No Cow Chocolate Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bar edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. No Cow Chocolate Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bar scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g), more protein per 100 calories (10.5g vs 8.4g).

Full side-by-side of protein, calories, macros, and protein density for No Cow Chocolate Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bar and Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH below.

No Cow

Chocolate Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bar

Wins on: Protein, Protein per 100 cal

Chocolate Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bar

Protein

20g

Calories

190

Protein per 100 cal

10.5g

protein bars4.2

Pros

  • More protein per serving: 20g vs 16g.
  • Better protein density: 10.5g protein per 100 calories.

Cons

  • Weaker review score: 4.2 vs 4.6.
View Full Product Details

Robert Irvine's

FITCRUNCH

Wins on: Sugar, Fiber, Sodium, Carbs, Fat

FITCRUNCH

Protein

16g

Calories

190

Protein per 100 cal

8.4g

protein bars4.6

Pros

  • Stronger shopper rating: 4.6 vs 4.2.

Cons

  • Less protein per serving: 16g vs 20g.
  • Lower protein density than No Cow Chocolate Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bar (8.4g vs 10.5g protein per 100 calories).
View Full Product Details
Side-by-Side Breakdown
MetricNo Cow Chocolate Peanut Butter Cup Protein BarRobert Irvine's FITCRUNCH
Protein20gBest16g
Calories190190
Sugar3gBest
Fiber0gBest
Sodium0.12mgBest
Carbs14gBest
Fat10gBest
Protein per 100 cal10.5gBest8.4g
Pick by what matters most to you

“Healthier” depends on your goal — here’s the real winner on every number we track, so two people with different priorities can both get the right answer.

  • Protein: No Cow Chocolate Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bar wins, 20g vs 16g.
  • Calories: it's a real tie — both at 190.
  • Sugar: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 3g vs —.
  • Fiber: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 0g vs —.
  • Sodium: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 0.12mg vs —.
  • Carbs: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 14g vs —.
  • Fat: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 10g vs —.
  • Protein per 100 cal: No Cow Chocolate Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bar wins, 10.5g vs 8.4g.

No Cow Chocolate Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bar edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend.

No Cow Chocolate Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bar scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g), more protein per 100 calories (10.5g vs 8.4g). This blend won’t match your priorities if sugar, carbs, or diet fit matter more to you than protein, calories, and rating.

Frequently Asked Questions

No Cow Chocolate Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bar vs Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH: which has more protein?

No Cow Chocolate Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bar has more protein per serving: 20g versus 16g.

Which option is better for a lower-calorie snack?

No Cow Chocolate Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bar and Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH are tied at 190 calories per serving.

Which snack packs more protein for the calories?

No Cow Chocolate Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bar is the more protein-dense pick at about 10.5g of protein per 100 calories.

Which is healthier, No Cow Chocolate Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bar vs Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH?

"Healthier" depends on your goal: No Cow Chocolate Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bar has more protein (20g vs 16g). Neither is objectively the "healthiest" for everyone — see the pick-by-priority breakdown above, or try our free AI Snack Finder to get matched to your specific goal.

What is the final verdict in this comparison?

No Cow Chocolate Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bar edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. No Cow Chocolate Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bar scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g), more protein per 100 calories (10.5g vs 8.4g). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.

Get weekly protein snack picks

Data-ranked comparisons and new picks. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.