No Cow Chocolate Fudge Brownie Protein Bar vs Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH
This is a close call between No Cow Chocolate Fudge Brownie Protein Bar and Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH has a slight edge in that blend because it offers a lighter calorie hit (190 vs 250) and more protein per 100 calories (8.4g vs 8.0g).
Full side-by-side of protein, calories, macros, and protein density for No Cow Chocolate Fudge Brownie Protein Bar and Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH below.
No Cow
Wins on: Protein
Protein
20g
Calories
250
Protein per 100 cal
8.0g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 20g vs 16g.
Cons
- Higher calorie count: 250 vs 190.
- Lower protein density than Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH (8.0g vs 8.4g protein per 100 calories).
Robert Irvine's
Wins on: Calories, Sugar, Fiber, Sodium, Carbs, Fat, Protein per 100 cal
Protein
16g
Calories
190
Protein per 100 cal
8.4g
Pros
- Lower calorie load: 190 calories vs 250.
- Better protein density: 8.4g protein per 100 calories.
- Stronger shopper rating: 4.6 vs 0.0.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 16g vs 20g.
| Metric | No Cow Chocolate Fudge Brownie Protein Bar | Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 20gBest | 16g |
| Calories | 250 | 190Best |
| Sugar | — | 3gBest |
| Fiber | — | 0gBest |
| Sodium | — | 0.12mgBest |
| Carbs | — | 14gBest |
| Fat | — | 10gBest |
| Protein per 100 cal | 8.0g | 8.4gBest |
“Healthier” depends on your goal — here’s the real winner on every number we track, so two people with different priorities can both get the right answer.
- Protein: No Cow Chocolate Fudge Brownie Protein Bar wins, 20g vs 16g.
- Calories: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 190 vs 250.
- Sugar: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 3g vs —.
- Fiber: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 0g vs —.
- Sodium: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 0.12mg vs —.
- Carbs: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 14g vs —.
- Fat: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 10g vs —.
- Protein per 100 cal: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 8.4g vs 8.0g.
This is a close call between No Cow Chocolate Fudge Brownie Protein Bar and Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH on a protein + calorie + rating blend.
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH has a slight edge in that blend because it offers a lighter calorie hit (190 vs 250) and more protein per 100 calories (8.4g vs 8.0g). This blend won’t match your priorities if sugar, carbs, or diet fit matter more to you than protein, calories, and rating.
Frequently Asked Questions
No Cow Chocolate Fudge Brownie Protein Bar has more protein per serving: 20g versus 16g.
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH is the lighter option at 190 calories, compared with 250 calories for the alternative.
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH is the more protein-dense pick at about 8.4g of protein per 100 calories.
"Healthier" depends on your goal: No Cow Chocolate Fudge Brownie Protein Bar has more protein (20g vs 16g); Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH is lower in calories (190 vs 250). Neither is objectively the "healthiest" for everyone — see the pick-by-priority breakdown above, or try our free AI Snack Finder to get matched to your specific goal.
This is a close call between No Cow Chocolate Fudge Brownie Protein Bar and Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH has a slight edge in that blend because it offers a lighter calorie hit (190 vs 250) and more protein per 100 calories (8.4g vs 8.0g). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.
Get weekly protein snack picks
Data-ranked comparisons and new picks. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.