Product Comparison

Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate vs Muscle Milk Pro Series Protein Shake - Knockout Chocolate

Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (42g vs 40g), a lighter calorie hit (230 vs 260), more protein per 100 calories (18.3g vs 15.4g).

Full side-by-side of protein, calories, macros, and protein density for Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate and Muscle Milk Pro Series Protein Shake - Knockout Chocolate below.

Fairlife

Core Power Elite - Chocolate

Wins on: Protein, Calories, Carbs, Fat, Protein per 100 cal

Core Power Elite - Chocolate

Protein

42g

Calories

230

Protein per 100 cal

18.3g

protein drinks4.6

Pros

  • More protein per serving: 42g vs 40g.
  • Lower calorie load: 230 calories vs 260.
  • Better protein density: 18.3g protein per 100 calories.

Cons

  • There is no major downside in this head-to-head, so the choice comes down to taste and retailer preference.
View Full Product Details

Muscle Milk

Pro Series Protein Shake - Knockout Chocolate

Wins on: Fiber

Pro Series Protein Shake - Knockout Chocolate

Protein

40g

Calories

260

Protein per 100 cal

15.4g

protein drinks4.4

Pros

  • Competitive overall macros for a protein drinks option.

Cons

  • Less protein per serving: 40g vs 42g.
  • Higher calorie count: 260 vs 230.
View Full Product Details
Side-by-Side Breakdown
MetricFairlife Core Power Elite - ChocolateMuscle Milk Pro Series Protein Shake - Knockout Chocolate
Protein42gBest40g
Calories230Best260
Sugar3g3g
Fiber0g1gBest
Sodium——
Carbs5gBest9g
Fat3gBest6g
Protein per 100 cal18.3gBest15.4g
Pick by what matters most to you

“Healthier” depends on your goal — here’s the real winner on every number we track, so two people with different priorities can both get the right answer.

  • Protein: Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate wins, 42g vs 40g.
  • Calories: Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate wins, 230 vs 260.
  • Sugar: it's a real tie — both at 3g.
  • Fiber: Muscle Milk Pro Series Protein Shake - Knockout Chocolate wins, 1g vs 0g.
  • Carbs: Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate wins, 5g vs 9g.
  • Fat: Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate wins, 3g vs 6g.
  • Protein per 100 cal: Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate wins, 18.3g vs 15.4g.

Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend.

Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (42g vs 40g), a lighter calorie hit (230 vs 260), more protein per 100 calories (18.3g vs 15.4g). This blend won’t match your priorities if sugar, carbs, or diet fit matter more to you than protein, calories, and rating.

Frequently Asked Questions

Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate vs Muscle Milk Pro Series Protein Shake - Knockout Chocolate: which has more protein?

Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate has more protein per serving: 42g versus 40g.

Which option is better for a lower-calorie snack?

Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate is the lighter option at 230 calories, compared with 260 calories for the alternative.

Which snack packs more protein for the calories?

Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate is the more protein-dense pick at about 18.3g of protein per 100 calories.

Which is healthier, Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate vs Muscle Milk Pro Series Protein Shake - Knockout Chocolate?

"Healthier" depends on your goal: Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate has more protein (42g vs 40g); Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate is lower in calories (230 vs 260). Neither is objectively the "healthiest" for everyone — see the pick-by-priority breakdown above, or try our free AI Snack Finder to get matched to your specific goal.

What is the final verdict in this comparison?

Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (42g vs 40g), a lighter calorie hit (230 vs 260), more protein per 100 calories (18.3g vs 15.4g). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.

Get weekly protein snack picks

Data-ranked comparisons and new picks. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.