Product Comparison

IQBAR Almond Butter Chip & Peanut Butter Chip (24 Bars) vs Magic Spoon PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate

Magic Spoon PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Magic Spoon PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate scores higher in that blend because it offers a lighter calorie hit (140 vs 180), more protein per 100 calories (8.6g vs 6.7g).

Full side-by-side of protein, calories, macros, and protein density for IQBAR Almond Butter Chip & Peanut Butter Chip (24 Bars) and Magic Spoon PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate below.

IQBAR

Almond Butter Chip & Peanut Butter Chip (24 Bars)
Almond Butter Chip & Peanut Butter Chip (24 Bars)

Protein

12g

Calories

180

Protein per 100 cal

6.7g

protein bars4.8

Pros

  • Stronger shopper rating: 4.8 vs 4.4.

Cons

  • Higher calorie count: 180 vs 140.
  • Lower protein density than Magic Spoon PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate (6.7g vs 8.6g protein per 100 calories).
View Full Product Details

Magic Spoon

PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate

Wins on: Calories, Sugar, Fiber, Sodium, Carbs, Fat, Protein per 100 cal

PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate

Protein

12g

Calories

140

Protein per 100 cal

8.6g

protein bars4.4

Pros

  • Lower calorie load: 140 calories vs 180.
  • Better protein density: 8.6g protein per 100 calories.

Cons

  • Weaker review score: 4.4 vs 4.8.
View Full Product Details
Side-by-Side Breakdown
MetricIQBAR Almond Butter Chip & Peanut Butter Chip (24 Bars)Magic Spoon PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate
Protein12g12g
Calories180140Best
Sugar1gBest
Fiber13gBest
Sodium0.06mgBest
Carbs16gBest
Fat7gBest
Protein per 100 cal6.7g8.6gBest
Pick by what matters most to you

“Healthier” depends on your goal — here’s the real winner on every number we track, so two people with different priorities can both get the right answer.

  • Protein: it's a real tie — both at 12g.
  • Calories: Magic Spoon PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate wins, 140 vs 180.
  • Sugar: Magic Spoon PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate wins, 1g vs —.
  • Fiber: Magic Spoon PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate wins, 13g vs —.
  • Sodium: Magic Spoon PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate wins, 0.06mg vs —.
  • Carbs: Magic Spoon PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate wins, 16g vs —.
  • Fat: Magic Spoon PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate wins, 7g vs —.
  • Protein per 100 cal: Magic Spoon PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate wins, 8.6g vs 6.7g.

Magic Spoon PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend.

Magic Spoon PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate scores higher in that blend because it offers a lighter calorie hit (140 vs 180), more protein per 100 calories (8.6g vs 6.7g). This blend won’t match your priorities if sugar, carbs, or diet fit matter more to you than protein, calories, and rating.

Frequently Asked Questions

IQBAR Almond Butter Chip & Peanut Butter Chip (24 Bars) vs Magic Spoon PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate: which has more protein?

IQBAR Almond Butter Chip & Peanut Butter Chip (24 Bars) and Magic Spoon PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate both deliver 12g of protein per serving.

Which option is better for a lower-calorie snack?

Magic Spoon PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate is the lighter option at 140 calories, compared with 180 calories for the alternative.

Which snack packs more protein for the calories?

Magic Spoon PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate is the more protein-dense pick at about 8.6g of protein per 100 calories.

Which is healthier, IQBAR Almond Butter Chip & Peanut Butter Chip (24 Bars) vs Magic Spoon PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate?

"Healthier" depends on your goal: Magic Spoon PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate is lower in calories (140 vs 180). Neither is objectively the "healthiest" for everyone — see the pick-by-priority breakdown above, or try our free AI Snack Finder to get matched to your specific goal.

What is the final verdict in this comparison?

Magic Spoon PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Magic Spoon PROTEIN TREATS Double Chocolate scores higher in that blend because it offers a lighter calorie hit (140 vs 180), more protein per 100 calories (8.6g vs 6.7g). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.

Get weekly protein snack picks

Data-ranked comparisons and new picks. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.