Product Comparison

Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate vs Wilde Chicken & Himalayan Pink Salt Protein Chips

Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (42g vs 10g), more protein per 100 calories (18.3g vs 7.7g), the stronger user rating (4.6 vs 4.0).

Full side-by-side of protein, calories, macros, and protein density for Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate and Wilde Chicken & Himalayan Pink Salt Protein Chips below.

Fairlife

Core Power Elite - Chocolate

Wins on: Protein, Carbs, Fat, Protein per 100 cal

Core Power Elite - Chocolate

Protein

42g

Calories

230

Protein per 100 cal

18.3g

protein drinks4.6

Pros

  • More protein per serving: 42g vs 10g.
  • Better protein density: 18.3g protein per 100 calories.
  • Stronger shopper rating: 4.6 vs 4.0.

Cons

  • Higher calorie count: 230 vs 130.
View Full Product Details

Wilde

Chicken & Himalayan Pink Salt Protein Chips

Wins on: Calories, Sugar

Chicken & Himalayan Pink Salt Protein Chips

Protein

10g

Calories

130

Protein per 100 cal

7.7g

protein chips4.0

Pros

  • Lower calorie load: 130 calories vs 230.

Cons

  • Less protein per serving: 10g vs 42g.
  • Lower protein density than Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate (7.7g vs 18.3g protein per 100 calories).
View Full Product Details
Side-by-Side Breakdown
MetricFairlife Core Power Elite - ChocolateWilde Chicken & Himalayan Pink Salt Protein Chips
Protein42gBest10g
Calories230130Best
Sugar3g0gBest
Fiber0g0g
Sodium
Carbs5gBest9g
Fat3gBest5g
Protein per 100 cal18.3gBest7.7g
Pick by what matters most to you

“Healthier” depends on your goal — here’s the real winner on every number we track, so two people with different priorities can both get the right answer.

  • Protein: Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate wins, 42g vs 10g.
  • Calories: Wilde Chicken & Himalayan Pink Salt Protein Chips wins, 130 vs 230.
  • Sugar: Wilde Chicken & Himalayan Pink Salt Protein Chips wins, 0g vs 3g.
  • Fiber: it's a real tie — both at 0g.
  • Carbs: Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate wins, 5g vs 9g.
  • Fat: Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate wins, 3g vs 5g.
  • Protein per 100 cal: Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate wins, 18.3g vs 7.7g.

Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend.

Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (42g vs 10g), more protein per 100 calories (18.3g vs 7.7g), the stronger user rating (4.6 vs 4.0). This blend won’t match your priorities if sugar, carbs, or diet fit matter more to you than protein, calories, and rating.

Frequently Asked Questions

Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate vs Wilde Chicken & Himalayan Pink Salt Protein Chips: which has more protein?

Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate has more protein per serving: 42g versus 10g.

Which option is better for a lower-calorie snack?

Wilde Chicken & Himalayan Pink Salt Protein Chips is the lighter option at 130 calories, compared with 230 calories for the alternative.

Which snack packs more protein for the calories?

Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate is the more protein-dense pick at about 18.3g of protein per 100 calories.

Which is healthier, Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate vs Wilde Chicken & Himalayan Pink Salt Protein Chips?

"Healthier" depends on your goal: Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate has more protein (42g vs 10g); Wilde Chicken & Himalayan Pink Salt Protein Chips has less sugar (0g vs 3g); Wilde Chicken & Himalayan Pink Salt Protein Chips is lower in calories (130 vs 230). Neither is objectively the "healthiest" for everyone — see the pick-by-priority breakdown above, or try our free AI Snack Finder to get matched to your specific goal.

What is the final verdict in this comparison?

Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (42g vs 10g), more protein per 100 calories (18.3g vs 7.7g), the stronger user rating (4.6 vs 4.0). They sit in different categories, so format and texture may matter as much as the raw macros.

Get weekly protein snack picks

Data-ranked comparisons and new picks. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.