Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate vs Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate
Compare protein, calories, price, and overall value for Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate and Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate before you buy.
Fairlife
Protein
42g
Calories
230
Price
$34.99
Protein per $1
1.2g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 42g vs 30g.
- Better value on protein per dollar: 1.2g per $1.
Cons
- Higher calorie count: 230 vs 150.
- Higher price: $34.99 vs $27.99.
Fairlife
Protein
30g
Calories
150
Price
$27.99
Protein per $1
1.1g
Pros
- Lower calorie load: 150 calories vs 230.
- Stronger shopper rating: 4.8 vs 4.7.
- Lower shelf price: $27.99 vs $34.99.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 30g vs 42g.
- Lower protein-per-dollar efficiency than Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate.
| Metric | Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate | Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 42gBest | 30g |
| Calories | 230 | 150Best |
| Carbs | 5g | 4gBest |
| Fat | 3g | 2.5gBest |
| Price | $34.99 | $27.99Best |
| Protein per $1 | 1.2gBest | 1.1g |
Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate is the stronger overall pick in this matchup.
Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate wins here because it offers more protein per serving (42g vs 30g), better protein-per-dollar value (1.2g/$ vs 1.1g/$).
Choose Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate if you care more about more protein per serving: 42g vs 30g.
Choose Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate if you care more about lower calorie load: 150 calories vs 230.
Frequently Asked Questions
Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate has more protein per serving: 42g versus 30g.
Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate is the lighter option at 150 calories, compared with 230 calories for the alternative.
Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate delivers better protein-per-dollar value at about 1.2g per $1.
Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate is the stronger overall pick in this matchup. Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate wins here because it offers more protein per serving (42g vs 30g), better protein-per-dollar value (1.2g/$ vs 1.1g/$). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.