Chomps Jalapeño Beef vs Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds
Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (11g vs 10g), a lighter calorie hit (70 vs 100), more protein per 100 calories (15.7g vs 10.0g).
Full side-by-side of protein, calories, macros, and protein density for Chomps Jalapeño Beef and Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds below.
Chomps
Protein
10g
Calories
100
Protein per 100 cal
10.0g
Pros
- Stronger shopper rating: 4.6 vs 4.0.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 10g vs 11g.
- Higher calorie count: 100 vs 70.
Epic Provisions
Wins on: Protein, Calories, Carbs, Fat, Protein per 100 cal
Protein
11g
Calories
70
Protein per 100 cal
15.7g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 11g vs 10g.
- Lower calorie load: 70 calories vs 100.
- Better protein density: 15.7g protein per 100 calories.
Cons
- Weaker review score: 4.0 vs 4.6.
| Metric | Chomps Jalapeño Beef | Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 10g | 11gBest |
| Calories | 100 | 70Best |
| Sugar | 0g | 0g |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g |
| Sodium | — | — |
| Carbs | 1g | 0gBest |
| Fat | 7g | 2.5gBest |
| Protein per 100 cal | 10.0g | 15.7gBest |
“Healthier” depends on your goal — here’s the real winner on every number we track, so two people with different priorities can both get the right answer.
- Protein: Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds wins, 11g vs 10g.
- Calories: Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds wins, 70 vs 100.
- Sugar: it's a real tie — both at 0g.
- Fiber: it's a real tie — both at 0g.
- Carbs: Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds wins, 0g vs 1g.
- Fat: Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds wins, 2.5g vs 7g.
- Protein per 100 cal: Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds wins, 15.7g vs 10.0g.
Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend.
Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (11g vs 10g), a lighter calorie hit (70 vs 100), more protein per 100 calories (15.7g vs 10.0g). This blend won’t match your priorities if sugar, carbs, or diet fit matter more to you than protein, calories, and rating.
Frequently Asked Questions
Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds has more protein per serving: 11g versus 10g.
Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds is the lighter option at 70 calories, compared with 100 calories for the alternative.
Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds is the more protein-dense pick at about 15.7g of protein per 100 calories.
"Healthier" depends on your goal: Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds has more protein (11g vs 10g); Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds is lower in calories (70 vs 100). Neither is objectively the "healthiest" for everyone — see the pick-by-priority breakdown above, or try our free AI Snack Finder to get matched to your specific goal.
Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (11g vs 10g), a lighter calorie hit (70 vs 100), more protein per 100 calories (15.7g vs 10.0g). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.
Get weekly protein snack picks
Data-ranked comparisons and new picks. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.