Legendary Foods Cinnamon Protein Sweet Roll vs Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH
This is a close call between Legendary Foods Cinnamon Protein Sweet Roll and Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Legendary Foods Cinnamon Protein Sweet Roll has a slight edge in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g) and more protein per 100 calories (10.0g vs 8.4g).
Full side-by-side of protein, calories, macros, and protein density for Legendary Foods Cinnamon Protein Sweet Roll and Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH below.
Legendary Foods
Wins on: Protein, Protein per 100 cal
Protein
20g
Calories
200
Protein per 100 cal
10.0g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 20g vs 16g.
- Better protein density: 10.0g protein per 100 calories.
Cons
- Higher calorie count: 200 vs 190.
- Weaker review score: 0.0 vs 4.6.
Robert Irvine's
Wins on: Calories, Sugar, Fiber, Sodium, Carbs, Fat
Protein
16g
Calories
190
Protein per 100 cal
8.4g
Pros
- Lower calorie load: 190 calories vs 200.
- Stronger shopper rating: 4.6 vs 0.0.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 16g vs 20g.
- Lower protein density than Legendary Foods Cinnamon Protein Sweet Roll (8.4g vs 10.0g protein per 100 calories).
| Metric | Legendary Foods Cinnamon Protein Sweet Roll | Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 20gBest | 16g |
| Calories | 200 | 190Best |
| Sugar | — | 3gBest |
| Fiber | — | 0gBest |
| Sodium | — | 0.12mgBest |
| Carbs | — | 14gBest |
| Fat | — | 10gBest |
| Protein per 100 cal | 10.0gBest | 8.4g |
“Healthier” depends on your goal — here’s the real winner on every number we track, so two people with different priorities can both get the right answer.
- Protein: Legendary Foods Cinnamon Protein Sweet Roll wins, 20g vs 16g.
- Calories: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 190 vs 200.
- Sugar: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 3g vs —.
- Fiber: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 0g vs —.
- Sodium: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 0.12mg vs —.
- Carbs: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 14g vs —.
- Fat: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 10g vs —.
- Protein per 100 cal: Legendary Foods Cinnamon Protein Sweet Roll wins, 10.0g vs 8.4g.
This is a close call between Legendary Foods Cinnamon Protein Sweet Roll and Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH on a protein + calorie + rating blend.
Legendary Foods Cinnamon Protein Sweet Roll has a slight edge in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g) and more protein per 100 calories (10.0g vs 8.4g). This blend won’t match your priorities if sugar, carbs, or diet fit matter more to you than protein, calories, and rating.
Frequently Asked Questions
Legendary Foods Cinnamon Protein Sweet Roll has more protein per serving: 20g versus 16g.
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH is the lighter option at 190 calories, compared with 200 calories for the alternative.
Legendary Foods Cinnamon Protein Sweet Roll is the more protein-dense pick at about 10.0g of protein per 100 calories.
"Healthier" depends on your goal: Legendary Foods Cinnamon Protein Sweet Roll has more protein (20g vs 16g); Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH is lower in calories (190 vs 200). Neither is objectively the "healthiest" for everyone — see the pick-by-priority breakdown above, or try our free AI Snack Finder to get matched to your specific goal.
This is a close call between Legendary Foods Cinnamon Protein Sweet Roll and Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Legendary Foods Cinnamon Protein Sweet Roll has a slight edge in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g) and more protein per 100 calories (10.0g vs 8.4g). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.
Get weekly protein snack picks
Data-ranked comparisons and new picks. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.