Dymatize ISO100 Hydrolyzed Protein - Chocolate vs EPIC Beef Sea Salt & Pepper Protein Bar
Compare protein, calories, price, and overall value for Dymatize ISO100 Hydrolyzed Protein - Chocolate and EPIC Beef Sea Salt & Pepper Protein Bar before you buy.
Dymatize
Protein
25g
Calories
120
Price
$44.99
Protein per $1
0.6g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 25g vs 11g.
- Lower calorie load: 120 calories vs 130.
- Better value on protein per dollar: 0.6g per $1.
Cons
- Higher price: $44.99 vs $32.99.
EPIC
Protein
11g
Calories
130
Price
$32.99
Protein per $1
0.3g
Pros
- Lower shelf price: $32.99 vs $44.99.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 11g vs 25g.
- Higher calorie count: 130 vs 120.
| Metric | Dymatize ISO100 Hydrolyzed Protein - Chocolate | EPIC Beef Sea Salt & Pepper Protein Bar |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 25gBest | 11g |
| Calories | 120Best | 130 |
| Carbs | 2gBest | 7g |
| Fat | 1gBest | 5g |
| Price | $44.99 | $32.99Best |
| Protein per $1 | 0.6gBest | 0.3g |
Dymatize ISO100 Hydrolyzed Protein - Chocolate is the stronger overall pick in this matchup.
Dymatize ISO100 Hydrolyzed Protein - Chocolate wins here because it offers more protein per serving (25g vs 11g), a lighter calorie hit (120 vs 130), better protein-per-dollar value (0.6g/$ vs 0.3g/$).
Choose Dymatize ISO100 Hydrolyzed Protein - Chocolate if you care more about more protein per serving: 25g vs 11g.
Choose EPIC Beef Sea Salt & Pepper Protein Bar if you care more about lower shelf price: $32.99 vs $44.99.
Frequently Asked Questions
Dymatize ISO100 Hydrolyzed Protein - Chocolate has more protein per serving: 25g versus 11g.
Dymatize ISO100 Hydrolyzed Protein - Chocolate is the lighter option at 120 calories, compared with 130 calories for the alternative.
Dymatize ISO100 Hydrolyzed Protein - Chocolate delivers better protein-per-dollar value at about 0.6g per $1.
Dymatize ISO100 Hydrolyzed Protein - Chocolate is the stronger overall pick in this matchup. Dymatize ISO100 Hydrolyzed Protein - Chocolate wins here because it offers more protein per serving (25g vs 11g), a lighter calorie hit (120 vs 130), better protein-per-dollar value (0.6g/$ vs 0.3g/$). They sit in different categories, so format and texture may matter as much as the raw macros.