Product Comparison

David Peanut Butter Chocolate vs Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH

David Peanut Butter Chocolate edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. David Peanut Butter Chocolate scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g), a lighter calorie hit (150 vs 190), more protein per 100 calories (13.3g vs 8.4g).

Full side-by-side of protein, calories, macros, and protein density for David Peanut Butter Chocolate and Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH below.

David

Peanut Butter Chocolate

Wins on: Protein, Calories, Sugar, Fat, Protein per 100 cal

Peanut Butter Chocolate

Protein

20g

Calories

150

Protein per 100 cal

13.3g

protein bars4.2

Pros

  • More protein per serving: 20g vs 16g.
  • Lower calorie load: 150 calories vs 190.
  • Better protein density: 13.3g protein per 100 calories.

Cons

  • Weaker review score: 4.2 vs 4.6.
View Full Product Details

Robert Irvine's

FITCRUNCH

Wins on: Sodium, Carbs

FITCRUNCH

Protein

16g

Calories

190

Protein per 100 cal

8.4g

protein bars4.6

Pros

  • Stronger shopper rating: 4.6 vs 4.2.

Cons

  • Less protein per serving: 16g vs 20g.
  • Higher calorie count: 190 vs 150.
View Full Product Details
Side-by-Side Breakdown
MetricDavid Peanut Butter ChocolateRobert Irvine's FITCRUNCH
Protein20gBest16g
Calories150Best190
Sugar0gBest3g
Fiber0g0g
Sodium0.12mgBest
Carbs15g14gBest
Fat4.5gBest10g
Protein per 100 cal13.3gBest8.4g
Pick by what matters most to you

“Healthier” depends on your goal — here’s the real winner on every number we track, so two people with different priorities can both get the right answer.

  • Protein: David Peanut Butter Chocolate wins, 20g vs 16g.
  • Calories: David Peanut Butter Chocolate wins, 150 vs 190.
  • Sugar: David Peanut Butter Chocolate wins, 0g vs 3g.
  • Fiber: it's a real tie — both at 0g.
  • Sodium: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 0.12mg vs —.
  • Carbs: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 14g vs 15g.
  • Fat: David Peanut Butter Chocolate wins, 4.5g vs 10g.
  • Protein per 100 cal: David Peanut Butter Chocolate wins, 13.3g vs 8.4g.

David Peanut Butter Chocolate edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend.

David Peanut Butter Chocolate scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g), a lighter calorie hit (150 vs 190), more protein per 100 calories (13.3g vs 8.4g). This blend won’t match your priorities if sugar, carbs, or diet fit matter more to you than protein, calories, and rating.

Frequently Asked Questions

David Peanut Butter Chocolate vs Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH: which has more protein?

David Peanut Butter Chocolate has more protein per serving: 20g versus 16g.

Which option is better for a lower-calorie snack?

David Peanut Butter Chocolate is the lighter option at 150 calories, compared with 190 calories for the alternative.

Which snack packs more protein for the calories?

David Peanut Butter Chocolate is the more protein-dense pick at about 13.3g of protein per 100 calories.

Which is healthier, David Peanut Butter Chocolate vs Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH?

"Healthier" depends on your goal: David Peanut Butter Chocolate has more protein (20g vs 16g); David Peanut Butter Chocolate has less sugar (0g vs 3g); David Peanut Butter Chocolate is lower in calories (150 vs 190). Neither is objectively the "healthiest" for everyone — see the pick-by-priority breakdown above, or try our free AI Snack Finder to get matched to your specific goal.

What is the final verdict in this comparison?

David Peanut Butter Chocolate edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. David Peanut Butter Chocolate scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g), a lighter calorie hit (150 vs 190), more protein per 100 calories (13.3g vs 8.4g). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.

Get weekly protein snack picks

Data-ranked comparisons and new picks. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.