David Fudge Brownie vs MET-RX BIG 100 Blueberry Cobbler Meal Replacement Bar
David Fudge Brownie edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. David Fudge Brownie scores higher in that blend because it offers a lighter calorie hit (150 vs 400), more protein per 100 calories (18.7g vs 7.5g), the stronger user rating (4.2 vs 4.1).
Full side-by-side of protein, calories, macros, and protein density for David Fudge Brownie and MET-RX BIG 100 Blueberry Cobbler Meal Replacement Bar below.
David
Wins on: Calories, Protein per 100 cal
Protein
28g
Calories
150
Protein per 100 cal
18.7g
Pros
- Lower calorie load: 150 calories vs 400.
- Better protein density: 18.7g protein per 100 calories.
- Stronger shopper rating: 4.2 vs 4.1.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 28g vs 30g.
MET-RX
Wins on: Protein, Sugar, Fiber, Sodium, Carbs, Fat
Protein
30g
Calories
400
Protein per 100 cal
7.5g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 30g vs 28g.
Cons
- Higher calorie count: 400 vs 150.
- Lower protein density than David Fudge Brownie (7.5g vs 18.7g protein per 100 calories).
| Metric | David Fudge Brownie | MET-RX BIG 100 Blueberry Cobbler Meal Replacement Bar |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 28g | 30gBest |
| Calories | 150Best | 400 |
| Sugar | — | 24gBest |
| Fiber | — | 1gBest |
| Sodium | — | 0.38mgBest |
| Carbs | — | 48gBest |
| Fat | — | 5gBest |
| Protein per 100 cal | 18.7gBest | 7.5g |
“Healthier” depends on your goal — here’s the real winner on every number we track, so two people with different priorities can both get the right answer.
- Protein: MET-RX BIG 100 Blueberry Cobbler Meal Replacement Bar wins, 30g vs 28g.
- Calories: David Fudge Brownie wins, 150 vs 400.
- Sugar: MET-RX BIG 100 Blueberry Cobbler Meal Replacement Bar wins, 24g vs —.
- Fiber: MET-RX BIG 100 Blueberry Cobbler Meal Replacement Bar wins, 1g vs —.
- Sodium: MET-RX BIG 100 Blueberry Cobbler Meal Replacement Bar wins, 0.38mg vs —.
- Carbs: MET-RX BIG 100 Blueberry Cobbler Meal Replacement Bar wins, 48g vs —.
- Fat: MET-RX BIG 100 Blueberry Cobbler Meal Replacement Bar wins, 5g vs —.
- Protein per 100 cal: David Fudge Brownie wins, 18.7g vs 7.5g.
David Fudge Brownie edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend.
David Fudge Brownie scores higher in that blend because it offers a lighter calorie hit (150 vs 400), more protein per 100 calories (18.7g vs 7.5g), the stronger user rating (4.2 vs 4.1). This blend won’t match your priorities if sugar, carbs, or diet fit matter more to you than protein, calories, and rating.
Frequently Asked Questions
MET-RX BIG 100 Blueberry Cobbler Meal Replacement Bar has more protein per serving: 30g versus 28g.
David Fudge Brownie is the lighter option at 150 calories, compared with 400 calories for the alternative.
David Fudge Brownie is the more protein-dense pick at about 18.7g of protein per 100 calories.
"Healthier" depends on your goal: MET-RX BIG 100 Blueberry Cobbler Meal Replacement Bar has more protein (30g vs 28g); David Fudge Brownie is lower in calories (150 vs 400). Neither is objectively the "healthiest" for everyone — see the pick-by-priority breakdown above, or try our free AI Snack Finder to get matched to your specific goal.
David Fudge Brownie edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. David Fudge Brownie scores higher in that blend because it offers a lighter calorie hit (150 vs 400), more protein per 100 calories (18.7g vs 7.5g), the stronger user rating (4.2 vs 4.1). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.
Get weekly protein snack picks
Data-ranked comparisons and new picks. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.