David Double Chocolate vs Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH
David Double Chocolate edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. David Double Chocolate scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g), a lighter calorie hit (150 vs 190), more protein per 100 calories (13.3g vs 8.4g).
Full side-by-side of protein, calories, macros, and protein density for David Double Chocolate and Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH below.
David
Wins on: Protein, Calories, Protein per 100 cal
Protein
20g
Calories
150
Protein per 100 cal
13.3g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 20g vs 16g.
- Lower calorie load: 150 calories vs 190.
- Better protein density: 13.3g protein per 100 calories.
Cons
- Weaker review score: 4.2 vs 4.6.
Robert Irvine's
Wins on: Sugar, Fiber, Sodium, Carbs, Fat
Protein
16g
Calories
190
Protein per 100 cal
8.4g
Pros
- Stronger shopper rating: 4.6 vs 4.2.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 16g vs 20g.
- Higher calorie count: 190 vs 150.
| Metric | David Double Chocolate | Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 20gBest | 16g |
| Calories | 150Best | 190 |
| Sugar | — | 3gBest |
| Fiber | — | 0gBest |
| Sodium | — | 0.12mgBest |
| Carbs | — | 14gBest |
| Fat | — | 10gBest |
| Protein per 100 cal | 13.3gBest | 8.4g |
“Healthier” depends on your goal — here’s the real winner on every number we track, so two people with different priorities can both get the right answer.
- Protein: David Double Chocolate wins, 20g vs 16g.
- Calories: David Double Chocolate wins, 150 vs 190.
- Sugar: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 3g vs —.
- Fiber: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 0g vs —.
- Sodium: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 0.12mg vs —.
- Carbs: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 14g vs —.
- Fat: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 10g vs —.
- Protein per 100 cal: David Double Chocolate wins, 13.3g vs 8.4g.
David Double Chocolate edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend.
David Double Chocolate scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g), a lighter calorie hit (150 vs 190), more protein per 100 calories (13.3g vs 8.4g). This blend won’t match your priorities if sugar, carbs, or diet fit matter more to you than protein, calories, and rating.
Frequently Asked Questions
David Double Chocolate has more protein per serving: 20g versus 16g.
David Double Chocolate is the lighter option at 150 calories, compared with 190 calories for the alternative.
David Double Chocolate is the more protein-dense pick at about 13.3g of protein per 100 calories.
"Healthier" depends on your goal: David Double Chocolate has more protein (20g vs 16g); David Double Chocolate is lower in calories (150 vs 190). Neither is objectively the "healthiest" for everyone — see the pick-by-priority breakdown above, or try our free AI Snack Finder to get matched to your specific goal.
David Double Chocolate edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. David Double Chocolate scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g), a lighter calorie hit (150 vs 190), more protein per 100 calories (13.3g vs 8.4g). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.
Get weekly protein snack picks
Data-ranked comparisons and new picks. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.