Product Comparison

CLIF Builder's Protein Bar - Chocolate vs Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH

CLIF Builder's Protein Bar - Chocolate edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. CLIF Builder's Protein Bar - Chocolate scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g).

Full side-by-side of protein, calories, macros, and protein density for CLIF Builder's Protein Bar - Chocolate and Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH below.

CLIF

Builder's Protein Bar - Chocolate

Wins on: Protein, Fiber

Builder's Protein Bar - Chocolate

Protein

20g

Calories

280

Protein per 100 cal

7.1g

protein bars4.5

Pros

  • More protein per serving: 20g vs 16g.

Cons

  • Higher calorie count: 280 vs 190.
  • Lower protein density than Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH (7.1g vs 8.4g protein per 100 calories).
View Full Product Details

Robert Irvine's

FITCRUNCH

Wins on: Calories, Sugar, Sodium, Carbs, Protein per 100 cal

FITCRUNCH

Protein

16g

Calories

190

Protein per 100 cal

8.4g

protein bars4.5

Pros

  • Lower calorie load: 190 calories vs 280.
  • Better protein density: 8.4g protein per 100 calories.

Cons

  • Less protein per serving: 16g vs 20g.
View Full Product Details
Side-by-Side Breakdown
MetricCLIF Builder's Protein Bar - ChocolateRobert Irvine's FITCRUNCH
Protein20gBest16g
Calories280190Best
Sugar20g3gBest
Fiber4gBest0g
Sodium0.12mgBest
Carbs30g14gBest
Fat10g10g
Protein per 100 cal7.1g8.4gBest
Pick by what matters most to you

“Healthier” depends on your goal — here’s the real winner on every number we track, so two people with different priorities can both get the right answer.

  • Protein: CLIF Builder's Protein Bar - Chocolate wins, 20g vs 16g.
  • Calories: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 190 vs 280.
  • Sugar: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 3g vs 20g.
  • Fiber: CLIF Builder's Protein Bar - Chocolate wins, 4g vs 0g.
  • Sodium: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 0.12mg vs —.
  • Carbs: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 14g vs 30g.
  • Fat: it's a real tie — both at 10g.
  • Protein per 100 cal: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 8.4g vs 7.1g.

CLIF Builder's Protein Bar - Chocolate edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend.

CLIF Builder's Protein Bar - Chocolate scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g). This blend won’t match your priorities if sugar, carbs, or diet fit matter more to you than protein, calories, and rating.

Frequently Asked Questions

CLIF Builder's Protein Bar - Chocolate vs Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH: which has more protein?

CLIF Builder's Protein Bar - Chocolate has more protein per serving: 20g versus 16g.

Which option is better for a lower-calorie snack?

Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH is the lighter option at 190 calories, compared with 280 calories for the alternative.

Which snack packs more protein for the calories?

Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH is the more protein-dense pick at about 8.4g of protein per 100 calories.

Which is healthier, CLIF Builder's Protein Bar - Chocolate vs Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH?

"Healthier" depends on your goal: CLIF Builder's Protein Bar - Chocolate has more protein (20g vs 16g); Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH has less sugar (3g vs 20g); Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH is lower in calories (190 vs 280). Neither is objectively the "healthiest" for everyone — see the pick-by-priority breakdown above, or try our free AI Snack Finder to get matched to your specific goal.

What is the final verdict in this comparison?

CLIF Builder's Protein Bar - Chocolate edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. CLIF Builder's Protein Bar - Chocolate scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.

Get weekly protein snack picks

Data-ranked comparisons and new picks. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.