Chomps Savory Breakfast Chicken vs Chomps Turkey Stick - Original
Chomps Turkey Stick - Original is the stronger overall pick in this matchup. Chomps Turkey Stick - Original wins here because it offers a lighter calorie hit (70 vs 80), the stronger user rating (4.7 vs undefined).
Full side-by-side of protein, calories, macros, and protein density for Chomps Savory Breakfast Chicken and Chomps Turkey Stick - Original below.
Chomps

Protein
12g
Calories
80
Protein per 100 cal
15.0g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 12g vs 10g.
- Better protein density: 15.0g protein per 100 calories.
Cons
- Higher calorie count: 80 vs 70.
- Weaker review score: 0.0 vs 4.7.
Chomps
Protein
10g
Calories
70
Protein per 100 cal
14.3g
Pros
- Lower calorie load: 70 calories vs 80.
- Stronger shopper rating: 4.7 vs 0.0.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 10g vs 12g.
- Lower protein density than Chomps Savory Breakfast Chicken (14.3g vs 15.0g protein per 100 calories).
| Metric | Chomps Savory Breakfast Chicken | Chomps Turkey Stick - Original |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 12gBest | 10g |
| Calories | 80 | 70Best |
| Carbs | 1gBest | — |
| Fat | 5g | 3gBest |
| Protein per 100 cal | 15.0gBest | 14.3g |
Chomps Turkey Stick - Original is the stronger overall pick in this matchup.
Chomps Turkey Stick - Original wins here because it offers a lighter calorie hit (70 vs 80), the stronger user rating (4.7 vs undefined).
Choose Chomps Savory Breakfast Chicken if you care more about more protein per serving: 12g vs 10g.
Choose Chomps Turkey Stick - Original if you care more about lower calorie load: 70 calories vs 80.
Frequently Asked Questions
Chomps Savory Breakfast Chicken has more protein per serving: 12g versus 10g.
Chomps Turkey Stick - Original is the lighter option at 70 calories, compared with 80 calories for the alternative.
Chomps Savory Breakfast Chicken is the more protein-dense pick at about 15.0g of protein per 100 calories.
Chomps Turkey Stick - Original is the stronger overall pick in this matchup. Chomps Turkey Stick - Original wins here because it offers a lighter calorie hit (70 vs 80), the stronger user rating (4.7 vs undefined). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.
Get weekly protein snack picks
Data-ranked comparisons and new picks. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.