Chomps Original Turkey vs Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds
This is a close call between Chomps Original Turkey and Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Chomps Original Turkey has a slight edge in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (12g vs 11g) and the stronger user rating (4.6 vs 4.0).
Full side-by-side of protein, calories, macros, and protein density for Chomps Original Turkey and Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds below.
Chomps
Wins on: Protein, Fat
Protein
12g
Calories
80
Protein per 100 cal
15.0g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 12g vs 11g.
- Stronger shopper rating: 4.6 vs 4.0.
Cons
- Higher calorie count: 80 vs 70.
- Lower protein density than Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds (15.0g vs 15.7g protein per 100 calories).
Epic Provisions
Wins on: Calories, Protein per 100 cal
Protein
11g
Calories
70
Protein per 100 cal
15.7g
Pros
- Lower calorie load: 70 calories vs 80.
- Better protein density: 15.7g protein per 100 calories.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 11g vs 12g.
- Weaker review score: 4.0 vs 4.6.
| Metric | Chomps Original Turkey | Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 12gBest | 11g |
| Calories | 80 | 70Best |
| Sugar | 0g | 0g |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g |
| Sodium | — | — |
| Carbs | 0g | 0g |
| Fat | 2gBest | 2.5g |
| Protein per 100 cal | 15.0g | 15.7gBest |
“Healthier” depends on your goal — here’s the real winner on every number we track, so two people with different priorities can both get the right answer.
- Protein: Chomps Original Turkey wins, 12g vs 11g.
- Calories: Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds wins, 70 vs 80.
- Sugar: it's a real tie — both at 0g.
- Fiber: it's a real tie — both at 0g.
- Carbs: it's a real tie — both at 0g.
- Fat: Chomps Original Turkey wins, 2g vs 2.5g.
- Protein per 100 cal: Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds wins, 15.7g vs 15.0g.
This is a close call between Chomps Original Turkey and Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds on a protein + calorie + rating blend.
Chomps Original Turkey has a slight edge in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (12g vs 11g) and the stronger user rating (4.6 vs 4.0). This blend won’t match your priorities if sugar, carbs, or diet fit matter more to you than protein, calories, and rating.
Frequently Asked Questions
Chomps Original Turkey has more protein per serving: 12g versus 11g.
Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds is the lighter option at 70 calories, compared with 80 calories for the alternative.
Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds is the more protein-dense pick at about 15.7g of protein per 100 calories.
"Healthier" depends on your goal: Chomps Original Turkey has more protein (12g vs 11g); Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds is lower in calories (70 vs 80). Neither is objectively the "healthiest" for everyone — see the pick-by-priority breakdown above, or try our free AI Snack Finder to get matched to your specific goal.
This is a close call between Chomps Original Turkey and Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Chomps Original Turkey has a slight edge in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (12g vs 11g) and the stronger user rating (4.6 vs 4.0). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.
Get weekly protein snack picks
Data-ranked comparisons and new picks. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.