Product Comparison

Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi vs David Wild Caught Atlantic Cod

Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi is the stronger overall pick in this matchup. Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi wins here because it offers more protein per serving (22g vs 18g), more protein per 100 calories (27.5g vs 25.7g), the stronger user rating (4.6 vs undefined).

Full side-by-side of protein, calories, macros, and protein density for Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi and David Wild Caught Atlantic Cod below.

Bumble Bee

Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi
Verdict Winner
Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi

Protein

22g

Calories

80

Protein per 100 cal

27.5g

tuna snacks4.6

Pros

  • More protein per serving: 22g vs 18g.
  • Better protein density: 27.5g protein per 100 calories.
  • Stronger shopper rating: 4.6 vs 0.0.

Cons

  • Higher calorie count: 80 vs 70.
View Full Product Details

David

Wild Caught Atlantic Cod
Wild Caught Atlantic Cod

Protein

18g

Calories

70

Protein per 100 cal

25.7g

tuna snacks

Pros

  • Lower calorie load: 70 calories vs 80.

Cons

  • Less protein per serving: 18g vs 22g.
  • Lower protein density than Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi (25.7g vs 27.5g protein per 100 calories).
View Full Product Details
Side-by-Side Breakdown
MetricBumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC CertiDavid Wild Caught Atlantic Cod
Protein22gBest18g
Calories8070Best
Carbs
Fat
Protein per 100 cal27.5gBest25.7g
Verdict

Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi is the stronger overall pick in this matchup.

Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi wins here because it offers more protein per serving (22g vs 18g), more protein per 100 calories (27.5g vs 25.7g), the stronger user rating (4.6 vs undefined).

Choose Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi if you care more about more protein per serving: 22g vs 18g.

Choose David Wild Caught Atlantic Cod if you care more about lower calorie load: 70 calories vs 80.

Frequently Asked Questions

Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi vs David Wild Caught Atlantic Cod: which has more protein?

Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi has more protein per serving: 22g versus 18g.

Which option is better for a lower-calorie snack?

David Wild Caught Atlantic Cod is the lighter option at 70 calories, compared with 80 calories for the alternative.

Which snack packs more protein for the calories?

Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi is the more protein-dense pick at about 27.5g of protein per 100 calories.

What is the final verdict in this comparison?

Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi is the stronger overall pick in this matchup. Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi wins here because it offers more protein per serving (22g vs 18g), more protein per 100 calories (27.5g vs 25.7g), the stronger user rating (4.6 vs undefined). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.

Get weekly protein snack picks

Data-ranked comparisons and new picks. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.