Bumble Bee Chipotle Seasoned Tuna, 2.5 oz Pouch - Ready to Eat - Wild Caught Tuna Packet - 14g Protein per Serving - Gluten F vs StarKist Tuna Creations Sweet and Spicy Pouch (2.6 oz - 1 Pack) Wild Caught, High Protein Shelf Stable Seafood, Gluten Free,
This is a close call between Bumble Bee Chipotle Seasoned Tuna, 2.5 oz Pouch - Ready to Eat - Wild Caught Tuna Packet - 14g Protein per Serving - Gluten F and StarKist Tuna Creations Sweet and Spicy Pouch (2.6 oz - 1 Pack) Wild Caught, High Protein Shelf Stable Seafood, Gluten Free,. StarKist Tuna Creations Sweet and Spicy Pouch (2.6 oz - 1 Pack) Wild Caught, High Protein Shelf Stable Seafood, Gluten Free, has a slight edge because it offers more protein per serving (16g vs 14g) and the stronger user rating (4.7 vs 4.4).
Full side-by-side of protein, calories, macros, and protein density for Bumble Bee Chipotle Seasoned Tuna, 2.5 oz Pouch - Ready to Eat - Wild Caught Tuna Packet - 14g Protein per Serving - Gluten F and StarKist Tuna Creations Sweet and Spicy Pouch (2.6 oz - 1 Pack) Wild Caught, High Protein Shelf Stable Seafood, Gluten Free, below.
Bumble Bee
Protein
14g
Calories
70
Protein per 100 cal
20.0g
Pros
- Lower calorie load: 70 calories vs 90.
- Better protein density: 20.0g protein per 100 calories.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 14g vs 16g.
- Weaker review score: 4.4 vs 4.7.
StarKist Tuna
Protein
16g
Calories
90
Protein per 100 cal
17.8g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 16g vs 14g.
- Stronger shopper rating: 4.7 vs 4.4.
Cons
- Higher calorie count: 90 vs 70.
- Lower protein density than Bumble Bee Chipotle Seasoned Tuna, 2.5 oz Pouch - Ready to Eat - Wild Caught Tuna Packet - 14g Protein per Serving - Gluten F (17.8g vs 20.0g protein per 100 calories).
| Metric | Bumble Bee Chipotle Seasoned Tuna, 2.5 oz Pouch - Ready to Eat - Wild Caught Tuna Packet - 14g Protein per Serving - Gluten F | StarKist Tuna Creations Sweet and Spicy Pouch (2.6 oz - 1 Pack) Wild Caught, High Protein Shelf Stable Seafood, Gluten Free, |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 14g | 16gBest |
| Calories | 70Best | 90 |
| Carbs | — | — |
| Fat | — | 0.5gBest |
| Protein per 100 cal | 20.0gBest | 17.8g |
This is a close call between Bumble Bee Chipotle Seasoned Tuna, 2.5 oz Pouch - Ready to Eat - Wild Caught Tuna Packet - 14g Protein per Serving - Gluten F and StarKist Tuna Creations Sweet and Spicy Pouch (2.6 oz - 1 Pack) Wild Caught, High Protein Shelf Stable Seafood, Gluten Free,.
StarKist Tuna Creations Sweet and Spicy Pouch (2.6 oz - 1 Pack) Wild Caught, High Protein Shelf Stable Seafood, Gluten Free, has a slight edge because it offers more protein per serving (16g vs 14g) and the stronger user rating (4.7 vs 4.4).
Choose Bumble Bee Chipotle Seasoned Tuna, 2.5 oz Pouch - Ready to Eat - Wild Caught Tuna Packet - 14g Protein per Serving - Gluten F if you care more about lower calorie load: 70 calories vs 90.
Choose StarKist Tuna Creations Sweet and Spicy Pouch (2.6 oz - 1 Pack) Wild Caught, High Protein Shelf Stable Seafood, Gluten Free, if you care more about more protein per serving: 16g vs 14g.
Frequently Asked Questions
StarKist Tuna Creations Sweet and Spicy Pouch (2.6 oz - 1 Pack) Wild Caught, High Protein Shelf Stable Seafood, Gluten Free, has more protein per serving: 16g versus 14g.
Bumble Bee Chipotle Seasoned Tuna, 2.5 oz Pouch - Ready to Eat - Wild Caught Tuna Packet - 14g Protein per Serving - Gluten F is the lighter option at 70 calories, compared with 90 calories for the alternative.
Bumble Bee Chipotle Seasoned Tuna, 2.5 oz Pouch - Ready to Eat - Wild Caught Tuna Packet - 14g Protein per Serving - Gluten F is the more protein-dense pick at about 20.0g of protein per 100 calories.
This is a close call between Bumble Bee Chipotle Seasoned Tuna, 2.5 oz Pouch - Ready to Eat - Wild Caught Tuna Packet - 14g Protein per Serving - Gluten F and StarKist Tuna Creations Sweet and Spicy Pouch (2.6 oz - 1 Pack) Wild Caught, High Protein Shelf Stable Seafood, Gluten Free,. StarKist Tuna Creations Sweet and Spicy Pouch (2.6 oz - 1 Pack) Wild Caught, High Protein Shelf Stable Seafood, Gluten Free, has a slight edge because it offers more protein per serving (16g vs 14g) and the stronger user rating (4.7 vs 4.4). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.
Get weekly protein snack picks
Data-ranked comparisons and new picks. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.