Barebells Orange Creamsicle vs Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH
Barebells Orange Creamsicle edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Barebells Orange Creamsicle scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g), more protein per 100 calories (9.5g vs 8.4g).
Full side-by-side of protein, calories, macros, and protein density for Barebells Orange Creamsicle and Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH below.
Barebells
Wins on: Protein, Sugar, Fiber, Fat, Protein per 100 cal
Protein
20g
Calories
210
Protein per 100 cal
9.5g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 20g vs 16g.
- Better protein density: 9.5g protein per 100 calories.
Cons
- Higher calorie count: 210 vs 190.
- Weaker review score: 4.4 vs 4.6.
Robert Irvine's
Wins on: Calories, Sodium, Carbs
Protein
16g
Calories
190
Protein per 100 cal
8.4g
Pros
- Lower calorie load: 190 calories vs 210.
- Stronger shopper rating: 4.6 vs 4.4.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 16g vs 20g.
- Lower protein density than Barebells Orange Creamsicle (8.4g vs 9.5g protein per 100 calories).
| Metric | Barebells Orange Creamsicle | Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 20gBest | 16g |
| Calories | 210 | 190Best |
| Sugar | 2gBest | 3g |
| Fiber | 3gBest | 0g |
| Sodium | — | 0.12mgBest |
| Carbs | 20g | 14gBest |
| Fat | 7gBest | 10g |
| Protein per 100 cal | 9.5gBest | 8.4g |
“Healthier” depends on your goal — here’s the real winner on every number we track, so two people with different priorities can both get the right answer.
- Protein: Barebells Orange Creamsicle wins, 20g vs 16g.
- Calories: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 190 vs 210.
- Sugar: Barebells Orange Creamsicle wins, 2g vs 3g.
- Fiber: Barebells Orange Creamsicle wins, 3g vs 0g.
- Sodium: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 0.12mg vs —.
- Carbs: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 14g vs 20g.
- Fat: Barebells Orange Creamsicle wins, 7g vs 10g.
- Protein per 100 cal: Barebells Orange Creamsicle wins, 9.5g vs 8.4g.
Barebells Orange Creamsicle edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend.
Barebells Orange Creamsicle scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g), more protein per 100 calories (9.5g vs 8.4g). This blend won’t match your priorities if sugar, carbs, or diet fit matter more to you than protein, calories, and rating.
Frequently Asked Questions
Barebells Orange Creamsicle has more protein per serving: 20g versus 16g.
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH is the lighter option at 190 calories, compared with 210 calories for the alternative.
Barebells Orange Creamsicle is the more protein-dense pick at about 9.5g of protein per 100 calories.
"Healthier" depends on your goal: Barebells Orange Creamsicle has more protein (20g vs 16g); Barebells Orange Creamsicle has less sugar (2g vs 3g); Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH is lower in calories (190 vs 210). Neither is objectively the "healthiest" for everyone — see the pick-by-priority breakdown above, or try our free AI Snack Finder to get matched to your specific goal.
Barebells Orange Creamsicle edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Barebells Orange Creamsicle scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g), more protein per 100 calories (9.5g vs 8.4g). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.
Get weekly protein snack picks
Data-ranked comparisons and new picks. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.