High Protein Snacks
Open Interactive Compare
Product Comparison

Barebells Mint Chocolate Crisp vs Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH

Barebells Mint Chocolate Crisp edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Barebells Mint Chocolate Crisp scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g), more protein per 100 calories (9.5g vs 8.4g).

Full side-by-side of protein, calories, macros, and protein density for Barebells Mint Chocolate Crisp and Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH below.

Barebells

Barebells Mint Chocolate Crisp

Wins on: Protein, Sugar, Fiber, Fat, Protein per 100 cal

Barebells Mint Chocolate Crisp

Protein

20g

Calories

210

Protein per 100 cal

9.5g

protein bars4.6

Pros

  • More protein per serving: 20g vs 16g.
  • Better protein density: 9.5g protein per 100 calories.

Cons

  • Higher calorie count: 210 vs 190.
View Full Product Details

Robert Irvine's

FITCRUNCH

Wins on: Calories, Sodium, Carbs

FITCRUNCH

Protein

16g

Calories

190

Protein per 100 cal

8.4g

protein bars4.6

Pros

  • Lower calorie load: 190 calories vs 210.

Cons

  • Less protein per serving: 16g vs 20g.
  • Lower protein density than Barebells Mint Chocolate Crisp (8.4g vs 9.5g protein per 100 calories).
View Full Product Details
Side-by-Side Breakdown
MetricBarebells Mint Chocolate CrispRobert Irvine's FITCRUNCH
Protein20gBest16g
Calories210190Best
Sugar1gBest3g
Fiber3gBest0g
Sodium—0.12mgBest
Carbs20g14gBest
Fat7gBest10g
Protein per 100 cal9.5gBest8.4g
Pick by what matters most to you

“Healthier” depends on your goal — here’s the real winner on every number we track, so two people with different priorities can both get the right answer.

  • Protein: Barebells Mint Chocolate Crisp wins, 20g vs 16g.
  • Calories: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 190 vs 210.
  • Sugar: Barebells Mint Chocolate Crisp wins, 1g vs 3g.
  • Fiber: Barebells Mint Chocolate Crisp wins, 3g vs 0g.
  • Sodium: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 0.12mg vs —.
  • Carbs: Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH wins, 14g vs 20g.
  • Fat: Barebells Mint Chocolate Crisp wins, 7g vs 10g.
  • Protein per 100 cal: Barebells Mint Chocolate Crisp wins, 9.5g vs 8.4g.

Barebells Mint Chocolate Crisp edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend.

Barebells Mint Chocolate Crisp scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g), more protein per 100 calories (9.5g vs 8.4g). This blend won’t match your priorities if sugar, carbs, or diet fit matter more to you than protein, calories, and rating.

Not sure what matters most? Try our free AI Snack FinderHow we rank these

Frequently Asked Questions

Barebells Mint Chocolate Crisp vs Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH: which has more protein?

Barebells Mint Chocolate Crisp has more protein per serving: 20g versus 16g.

Which option is better for a lower-calorie snack?

Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH is the lighter option at 190 calories, compared with 210 calories for the alternative.

Which snack packs more protein for the calories?

Barebells Mint Chocolate Crisp is the more protein-dense pick at about 9.5g of protein per 100 calories.

Which is healthier, Barebells Mint Chocolate Crisp vs Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH?

"Healthier" depends on your goal: Barebells Mint Chocolate Crisp has more protein (20g vs 16g); Barebells Mint Chocolate Crisp has less sugar (1g vs 3g); Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH is lower in calories (190 vs 210). Neither is objectively the "healthiest" for everyone — see the pick-by-priority breakdown above, or try our free AI Snack Finder to get matched to your specific goal.

What is the final verdict in this comparison?

Barebells Mint Chocolate Crisp edges ahead on a protein + calorie + rating blend. Barebells Mint Chocolate Crisp scores higher in that blend because it offers more protein per serving (20g vs 16g), more protein per 100 calories (9.5g vs 8.4g). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.

Get weekly protein snack picks

Data-ranked comparisons and new picks. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.