ALOHA Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bars vs Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH
This is a close call between ALOHA Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bars and Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH. Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH has a slight edge because it offers more protein per serving (16g vs 14g) and a lighter calorie hit (190 vs 250).
Full side-by-side of protein, calories, macros, and protein density for ALOHA Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bars and Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH below.
ALOHA

Protein
14g
Calories
250
Protein per 100 cal
5.6g
Pros
- Stronger shopper rating: 4.9 vs 0.0.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 14g vs 16g.
- Higher calorie count: 250 vs 190.
Robert Irvine's
Protein
16g
Calories
190
Protein per 100 cal
8.4g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 16g vs 14g.
- Lower calorie load: 190 calories vs 250.
- Better protein density: 8.4g protein per 100 calories.
Cons
- Weaker review score: 0.0 vs 4.9.
| Metric | ALOHA Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bars | Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 14g | 16gBest |
| Calories | 250 | 190Best |
| Carbs | 20g | 14gBest |
| Fat | 10g | 10g |
| Protein per 100 cal | 5.6g | 8.4gBest |
This is a close call between ALOHA Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bars and Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH.
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH has a slight edge because it offers more protein per serving (16g vs 14g) and a lighter calorie hit (190 vs 250).
Choose ALOHA Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bars if you care more about stronger shopper rating: 4.9 vs 0.0.
Choose Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH if you care more about more protein per serving: 16g vs 14g.
Frequently Asked Questions
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH has more protein per serving: 16g versus 14g.
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH is the lighter option at 190 calories, compared with 250 calories for the alternative.
Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH is the more protein-dense pick at about 8.4g of protein per 100 calories.
This is a close call between ALOHA Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bars and Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH. Robert Irvine's FITCRUNCH has a slight edge because it offers more protein per serving (16g vs 14g) and a lighter calorie hit (190 vs 250). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.
Get weekly protein snack picks
Data-ranked comparisons and new picks. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.