Chomps Turkey Stick - Original vs Wilde Chips Chicken & Himalayan Pink Salt Protein Chips
Compare protein, calories, price, and overall value for Chomps Turkey Stick - Original and Wilde Chips Chicken & Himalayan Pink Salt Protein Chips before you buy.
Chomps
Protein
10g
Calories
70
Price
$27.99
Protein per $1
0.4g
Pros
- Lower calorie load: 70 calories vs 130.
- Stronger shopper rating: 4.7 vs 4.6.
Cons
- There is no major downside in this head-to-head, so the choice comes down to taste and retailer preference.
Wilde Chips
Protein
10g
Calories
130
Price
$27.99
Protein per $1
0.4g
Pros
- Competitive overall macros for a protein chips option.
Cons
- Higher calorie count: 130 vs 70.
- Weaker review score: 4.6 vs 4.7.
| Metric | Chomps Turkey Stick - Original | Wilde Chips Chicken & Himalayan Pink Salt Protein Chips |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 10g | 10g |
| Calories | 70Best | 130 |
| Carbs | — | 9gBest |
| Fat | 3gBest | 5g |
| Price | $27.99 | $27.99 |
| Protein per $1 | 0.4g | 0.4g |
Chomps Turkey Stick - Original is the stronger overall pick in this matchup.
Chomps Turkey Stick - Original wins here because it offers a lighter calorie hit (70 vs 130), the stronger user rating (4.7 vs 4.6).
Choose Chomps Turkey Stick - Original if you care more about lower calorie load: 70 calories vs 130.
Choose Wilde Chips Chicken & Himalayan Pink Salt Protein Chips if you care more about competitive overall macros for a protein chips option.
Frequently Asked Questions
Chomps Turkey Stick - Original and Wilde Chips Chicken & Himalayan Pink Salt Protein Chips both deliver 10g of protein per serving.
Chomps Turkey Stick - Original is the lighter option at 70 calories, compared with 130 calories for the alternative.
Chomps Turkey Stick - Original and Wilde Chips Chicken & Himalayan Pink Salt Protein Chips are effectively tied on protein per dollar at about 0.4g per $1.
Chomps Turkey Stick - Original is the stronger overall pick in this matchup. Chomps Turkey Stick - Original wins here because it offers a lighter calorie hit (70 vs 130), the stronger user rating (4.7 vs 4.6). They sit in different categories, so format and texture may matter as much as the raw macros.