ALOHA Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bars vs SimplyProtein Crispy Bars - Dark Chocolate Almond
Compare protein, calories, price, and overall value for ALOHA Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bars and SimplyProtein Crispy Bars - Dark Chocolate Almond before you buy.
ALOHA
Protein
14g
Calories
250
Price
$34.99
Protein per $1
0.4g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 14g vs 13g.
- Stronger shopper rating: 4.9 vs 4.0.
Cons
- Higher calorie count: 250 vs 160.
- Higher price: $34.99 vs $9.29.
SimplyProtein
Protein
13g
Calories
160
Price
$9.29
Protein per $1
1.4g
Pros
- Lower calorie load: 160 calories vs 250.
- Better value on protein per dollar: 1.4g per $1.
- Lower shelf price: $9.29 vs $34.99.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 13g vs 14g.
- Weaker review score: 4.0 vs 4.9.
| Metric | ALOHA Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bars | SimplyProtein Crispy Bars - Dark Chocolate Almond |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 14gBest | 13g |
| Calories | 250 | 160Best |
| Carbs | 20gBest | — |
| Fat | 10gBest | — |
| Price | $34.99 | $9.29Best |
| Protein per $1 | 0.4g | 1.4gBest |
SimplyProtein Crispy Bars - Dark Chocolate Almond is the stronger overall pick in this matchup.
SimplyProtein Crispy Bars - Dark Chocolate Almond wins here because it offers a lighter calorie hit (160 vs 250), better protein-per-dollar value (1.4g/$ vs 0.4g/$).
Choose ALOHA Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bars if you care more about more protein per serving: 14g vs 13g.
Choose SimplyProtein Crispy Bars - Dark Chocolate Almond if you care more about lower calorie load: 160 calories vs 250.
Frequently Asked Questions
ALOHA Peanut Butter Cup Protein Bars has more protein per serving: 14g versus 13g.
SimplyProtein Crispy Bars - Dark Chocolate Almond is the lighter option at 160 calories, compared with 250 calories for the alternative.
SimplyProtein Crispy Bars - Dark Chocolate Almond delivers better protein-per-dollar value at about 1.4g per $1.
SimplyProtein Crispy Bars - Dark Chocolate Almond is the stronger overall pick in this matchup. SimplyProtein Crispy Bars - Dark Chocolate Almond wins here because it offers a lighter calorie hit (160 vs 250), better protein-per-dollar value (1.4g/$ vs 0.4g/$). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.