Quest Nutrition Peanut Butter Cups, 11g Protein, 1g Sugar, Low Carb, Gluten Free, Keto Friendly, 4 Count vs Chomps Turkey Stick - Original
Compare protein, calories, price, and overall value for Quest Nutrition Peanut Butter Cups, 11g Protein, 1g Sugar, Low Carb, Gluten Free, Keto Friendly, 4 Count and Chomps Turkey Stick - Original before you buy.
Quest Nutrition
Protein
11g
Calories
190
Price
—
Protein per $1
—g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 11g vs 10g.
Cons
- Higher calorie count: 190 vs 70.
- Weaker review score: 0.0 vs 4.7.
Chomps
Protein
10g
Calories
70
Price
$27.99
Protein per $1
0.4g
Pros
- Lower calorie load: 70 calories vs 190.
- Stronger shopper rating: 4.7 vs 0.0.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 10g vs 11g.
| Metric | Quest Nutrition Peanut Butter Cups, 11g Protein, 1g Sugar, Low Carb, Gluten Free, Keto Friendly, 4 Count | Chomps Turkey Stick - Original |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 11gBest | 10g |
| Calories | 190 | 70Best |
| Carbs | — | — |
| Fat | — | 3gBest |
| Price | — | $27.99Best |
| Protein per $1 | — | 0.4gBest |
Chomps Turkey Stick - Original is the stronger overall pick in this matchup.
Chomps Turkey Stick - Original wins here because it offers a lighter calorie hit (70 vs 190), the stronger user rating (4.7 vs undefined).
Choose Quest Nutrition Peanut Butter Cups, 11g Protein, 1g Sugar, Low Carb, Gluten Free, Keto Friendly, 4 Count if you care more about more protein per serving: 11g vs 10g.
Choose Chomps Turkey Stick - Original if you care more about lower calorie load: 70 calories vs 190.
Frequently Asked Questions
Quest Nutrition Peanut Butter Cups, 11g Protein, 1g Sugar, Low Carb, Gluten Free, Keto Friendly, 4 Count has more protein per serving: 11g versus 10g.
Chomps Turkey Stick - Original is the lighter option at 70 calories, compared with 190 calories for the alternative.
Price-per-protein value is unclear because one of these products is missing pricing data.
Chomps Turkey Stick - Original is the stronger overall pick in this matchup. Chomps Turkey Stick - Original wins here because it offers a lighter calorie hit (70 vs 190), the stronger user rating (4.7 vs undefined). They sit in different categories, so format and texture may matter as much as the raw macros.