Legendary Foods S'mores Protein Pastry vs Pure Protein Blackout Cake AMMMAZE Protein Bars
Compare protein, calories, price, and overall value for Legendary Foods S'mores Protein Pastry and Pure Protein Blackout Cake AMMMAZE Protein Bars before you buy.
Legendary Foods

Protein
20g
Calories
180
Price
$32.49
Protein per $1
0.6g
Pros
- Lower calorie load: 180 calories vs 220.
- Stronger shopper rating: 4.9 vs 3.8.
Cons
- There is no major downside in this head-to-head, so the choice comes down to taste and retailer preference.
Pure Protein

Protein
20g
Calories
220
Price
—
Protein per $1
—g
Pros
- Competitive overall macros for a protein bars option.
Cons
- Higher calorie count: 220 vs 180.
- Weaker review score: 3.8 vs 4.9.
| Metric | Legendary Foods S'mores Protein Pastry | Pure Protein Blackout Cake AMMMAZE Protein Bars |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 20g | 20g |
| Calories | 180Best | 220 |
| Carbs | — | — |
| Fat | — | — |
| Price | $32.49Best | — |
| Protein per $1 | 0.6gBest | — |
This is a close call between Legendary Foods S'mores Protein Pastry and Pure Protein Blackout Cake AMMMAZE Protein Bars.
Legendary Foods S'mores Protein Pastry has a slight edge because it offers a lighter calorie hit (180 vs 220) and the stronger user rating (4.9 vs 3.8).
Choose Legendary Foods S'mores Protein Pastry if you care more about lower calorie load: 180 calories vs 220.
Choose Pure Protein Blackout Cake AMMMAZE Protein Bars if you care more about competitive overall macros for a protein bars option.
Frequently Asked Questions
Legendary Foods S'mores Protein Pastry and Pure Protein Blackout Cake AMMMAZE Protein Bars both deliver 20g of protein per serving.
Legendary Foods S'mores Protein Pastry is the lighter option at 180 calories, compared with 220 calories for the alternative.
Price-per-protein value is unclear because one of these products is missing pricing data.
This is a close call between Legendary Foods S'mores Protein Pastry and Pure Protein Blackout Cake AMMMAZE Protein Bars. Legendary Foods S'mores Protein Pastry has a slight edge because it offers a lighter calorie hit (180 vs 220) and the stronger user rating (4.9 vs 3.8). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.