Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate vs Quest Nutrition BBQ Original Style Protein Chips
Compare protein, calories, price, and overall value for Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate and Quest Nutrition BBQ Original Style Protein Chips before you buy.
Fairlife
Protein
30g
Calories
150
Price
$27.99
Protein per $1
1.1g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 30g vs 19g.
- Better value on protein per dollar: 1.1g per $1.
Cons
- Higher calorie count: 150 vs 140.
- Higher price: $27.99 vs $20.70.
Quest Nutrition
Protein
19g
Calories
140
Price
$20.70
Protein per $1
0.9g
Pros
- Lower calorie load: 140 calories vs 150.
- Lower shelf price: $20.70 vs $27.99.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 19g vs 30g.
- Lower protein-per-dollar efficiency than Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate.
| Metric | Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate | Quest Nutrition BBQ Original Style Protein Chips |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 30gBest | 19g |
| Calories | 150 | 140Best |
| Carbs | 4gBest | — |
| Fat | 2.5gBest | — |
| Price | $27.99 | $20.70Best |
| Protein per $1 | 1.1gBest | 0.9g |
Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate is the stronger overall pick in this matchup.
Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate wins here because it offers more protein per serving (30g vs 19g), better protein-per-dollar value (1.1g/$ vs 0.9g/$).
Choose Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate if you care more about more protein per serving: 30g vs 19g.
Choose Quest Nutrition BBQ Original Style Protein Chips if you care more about lower calorie load: 140 calories vs 150.
Frequently Asked Questions
Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate has more protein per serving: 30g versus 19g.
Quest Nutrition BBQ Original Style Protein Chips is the lighter option at 140 calories, compared with 150 calories for the alternative.
Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate delivers better protein-per-dollar value at about 1.1g per $1.
Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate is the stronger overall pick in this matchup. Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate wins here because it offers more protein per serving (30g vs 19g), better protein-per-dollar value (1.1g/$ vs 0.9g/$). They sit in different categories, so format and texture may matter as much as the raw macros.