Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate vs ONE Peanut Butter Pie Protein Bar
Compare protein, calories, price, and overall value for Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate and ONE Peanut Butter Pie Protein Bar before you buy.
Fairlife
Protein
42g
Calories
230
Price
$34.99
Protein per $1
1.2g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 42g vs 20g.
- Better value on protein per dollar: 1.2g per $1.
- Stronger shopper rating: 4.7 vs 4.6.
Cons
- Higher calorie count: 230 vs 220.
- Higher price: $34.99 vs $24.99.
ONE
Protein
20g
Calories
220
Price
$24.99
Protein per $1
0.8g
Pros
- Lower calorie load: 220 calories vs 230.
- Lower shelf price: $24.99 vs $34.99.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 20g vs 42g.
- Lower protein-per-dollar efficiency than Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate.
| Metric | Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate | ONE Peanut Butter Pie Protein Bar |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 42gBest | 20g |
| Calories | 230 | 220Best |
| Carbs | 5gBest | 23g |
| Fat | 3gBest | 8g |
| Price | $34.99 | $24.99Best |
| Protein per $1 | 1.2gBest | 0.8g |
Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate is the stronger overall pick in this matchup.
Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate wins here because it offers more protein per serving (42g vs 20g), better protein-per-dollar value (1.2g/$ vs 0.8g/$), the stronger user rating (4.7 vs 4.6).
Choose Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate if you care more about more protein per serving: 42g vs 20g.
Choose ONE Peanut Butter Pie Protein Bar if you care more about lower calorie load: 220 calories vs 230.
Frequently Asked Questions
Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate has more protein per serving: 42g versus 20g.
ONE Peanut Butter Pie Protein Bar is the lighter option at 220 calories, compared with 230 calories for the alternative.
Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate delivers better protein-per-dollar value at about 1.2g per $1.
Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate is the stronger overall pick in this matchup. Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate wins here because it offers more protein per serving (42g vs 20g), better protein-per-dollar value (1.2g/$ vs 0.8g/$), the stronger user rating (4.7 vs 4.6). They sit in different categories, so format and texture may matter as much as the raw macros.