Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate vs The Genius Brand Super Genius Energy Shot
Compare protein, calories, price, and overall value for Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate and The Genius Brand Super Genius Energy Shot before you buy.
Fairlife
Protein
42g
Calories
230
Price
$34.99
Protein per $1
1.2g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 42g vs 10g.
- Better value on protein per dollar: 1.2g per $1.
- Stronger shopper rating: 4.7 vs 4.6.
Cons
- Higher calorie count: 230 vs 45.
- Higher price: $34.99 vs $32.99.
The Genius Brand
Protein
10g
Calories
45
Price
$32.99
Protein per $1
0.3g
Pros
- Lower calorie load: 45 calories vs 230.
- Lower shelf price: $32.99 vs $34.99.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 10g vs 42g.
- Lower protein-per-dollar efficiency than Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate.
| Metric | Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate | The Genius Brand Super Genius Energy Shot |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 42gBest | 10g |
| Calories | 230 | 45Best |
| Carbs | 5g | 1gBest |
| Fat | 3gBest | — |
| Price | $34.99 | $32.99Best |
| Protein per $1 | 1.2gBest | 0.3g |
Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate is the stronger overall pick in this matchup.
Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate wins here because it offers more protein per serving (42g vs 10g), better protein-per-dollar value (1.2g/$ vs 0.3g/$), the stronger user rating (4.7 vs 4.6).
Choose Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate if you care more about more protein per serving: 42g vs 10g.
Choose The Genius Brand Super Genius Energy Shot if you care more about lower calorie load: 45 calories vs 230.
Frequently Asked Questions
Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate has more protein per serving: 42g versus 10g.
The Genius Brand Super Genius Energy Shot is the lighter option at 45 calories, compared with 230 calories for the alternative.
Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate delivers better protein-per-dollar value at about 1.2g per $1.
Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate is the stronger overall pick in this matchup. Fairlife Core Power Elite - Chocolate wins here because it offers more protein per serving (42g vs 10g), better protein-per-dollar value (1.2g/$ vs 0.3g/$), the stronger user rating (4.7 vs 4.6). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.