Product Comparison

Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds vs Wildebrands Korean Sweet & Spicy

Compare protein, calories, price, and overall value for Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds and Wildebrands Korean Sweet & Spicy before you buy.

Epic Provisions

Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds
Verdict Winner
Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds

Protein

11g

Calories

70

Price

$16.99

Protein per $1

0.6g

jerky meat snacks

Pros

  • More protein per serving: 11g vs 10g.
  • Lower calorie load: 70 calories vs 160.

Cons

  • There is no major downside in this head-to-head, so the choice comes down to taste and retailer preference.
View Full Product Details

Wildebrands

Korean Sweet & Spicy
Korean Sweet & Spicy

Protein

10g

Calories

160

Price

Protein per $1

g

protein chips

Pros

  • Competitive overall macros for a protein chips option.

Cons

  • Less protein per serving: 10g vs 11g.
  • Higher calorie count: 160 vs 70.
View Full Product Details
Side-by-Side Breakdown
MetricEpic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork RindsWildebrands Korean Sweet & Spicy
Protein11gBest10g
Calories70Best160
Carbs
Fat2.5gBest
Price$16.99Best
Protein per $10.6gBest
Verdict

Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds is the stronger overall pick in this matchup.

Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds wins here because it offers more protein per serving (11g vs 10g), a lighter calorie hit (70 vs 160).

Choose Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds if you care more about more protein per serving: 11g vs 10g.

Choose Wildebrands Korean Sweet & Spicy if you care more about competitive overall macros for a protein chips option.

Frequently Asked Questions

Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds vs Wildebrands Korean Sweet & Spicy: which has more protein?

Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds has more protein per serving: 11g versus 10g.

Which option is better for a lower-calorie snack?

Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds is the lighter option at 70 calories, compared with 160 calories for the alternative.

Which snack gives better protein value for the price?

Price-per-protein value is unclear because one of these products is missing pricing data.

What is the final verdict in this comparison?

Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds is the stronger overall pick in this matchup. Epic Provisions Pink Himalayan and Sea Salt Baked Pork Rinds wins here because it offers more protein per serving (11g vs 10g), a lighter calorie hit (70 vs 160). They sit in different categories, so format and texture may matter as much as the raw macros.