Dymatize ISO100 Hydrolyzed Protein - Chocolate vs Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate
Compare protein, calories, price, and overall value for Dymatize ISO100 Hydrolyzed Protein - Chocolate and Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate before you buy.
Dymatize
Protein
25g
Calories
120
Price
$44.99
Protein per $1
0.6g
Pros
- Lower calorie load: 120 calories vs 150.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 25g vs 30g.
- Higher price: $44.99 vs $27.99.
Fairlife
Protein
30g
Calories
150
Price
$27.99
Protein per $1
1.1g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 30g vs 25g.
- Better value on protein per dollar: 1.1g per $1.
- Stronger shopper rating: 4.8 vs 4.7.
Cons
- Higher calorie count: 150 vs 120.
| Metric | Dymatize ISO100 Hydrolyzed Protein - Chocolate | Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 25g | 30gBest |
| Calories | 120Best | 150 |
| Carbs | 2gBest | 4g |
| Fat | 1gBest | 2.5g |
| Price | $44.99 | $27.99Best |
| Protein per $1 | 0.6g | 1.1gBest |
Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate is the stronger overall pick in this matchup.
Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate wins here because it offers more protein per serving (30g vs 25g), better protein-per-dollar value (1.1g/$ vs 0.6g/$), the stronger user rating (4.8 vs 4.7).
Choose Dymatize ISO100 Hydrolyzed Protein - Chocolate if you care more about lower calorie load: 120 calories vs 150.
Choose Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate if you care more about more protein per serving: 30g vs 25g.
Frequently Asked Questions
Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate has more protein per serving: 30g versus 25g.
Dymatize ISO100 Hydrolyzed Protein - Chocolate is the lighter option at 120 calories, compared with 150 calories for the alternative.
Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate delivers better protein-per-dollar value at about 1.1g per $1.
Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate is the stronger overall pick in this matchup. Fairlife Nutrition Plan Shake - Chocolate wins here because it offers more protein per serving (30g vs 25g), better protein-per-dollar value (1.1g/$ vs 0.6g/$), the stronger user rating (4.8 vs 4.7). They sit in different categories, so format and texture may matter as much as the raw macros.