David Wild Caught Atlantic Cod vs Wildebrands Buttermilk Ranch
David Wild Caught Atlantic Cod is the stronger overall pick in this matchup. David Wild Caught Atlantic Cod wins here because it offers more protein per serving (18g vs 13g), a lighter calorie hit (70 vs 150).
Full side-by-side of protein, calories, macros, price, and value for David Wild Caught Atlantic Cod and Wildebrands Buttermilk Ranch below.
David
Protein
18g
Calories
70
Price
$39.00
Protein per $1
0.5g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 18g vs 13g.
- Lower calorie load: 70 calories vs 150.
Cons
- There is no major downside in this head-to-head, so the choice comes down to taste and retailer preference.
Wildebrands
Protein
13g
Calories
150
Price
—
Protein per $1
—g
Pros
- Competitive overall macros for a protein chips option.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 13g vs 18g.
- Higher calorie count: 150 vs 70.
| Metric | David Wild Caught Atlantic Cod | Wildebrands Buttermilk Ranch |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 18gBest | 13g |
| Calories | 70Best | 150 |
| Carbs | — | 2gBest |
| Fat | — | 7gBest |
| Price | $39.00Best | — |
| Protein per $1 | 0.5gBest | — |
David Wild Caught Atlantic Cod is the stronger overall pick in this matchup.
David Wild Caught Atlantic Cod wins here because it offers more protein per serving (18g vs 13g), a lighter calorie hit (70 vs 150).
Choose David Wild Caught Atlantic Cod if you care more about more protein per serving: 18g vs 13g.
Choose Wildebrands Buttermilk Ranch if you care more about competitive overall macros for a protein chips option.
Frequently Asked Questions
David Wild Caught Atlantic Cod has more protein per serving: 18g versus 13g.
David Wild Caught Atlantic Cod is the lighter option at 70 calories, compared with 150 calories for the alternative.
Price-per-protein value is unclear because one of these products is missing pricing data.
David Wild Caught Atlantic Cod is the stronger overall pick in this matchup. David Wild Caught Atlantic Cod wins here because it offers more protein per serving (18g vs 13g), a lighter calorie hit (70 vs 150). They sit in different categories, so format and texture may matter as much as the raw macros.