CLIF Builder's Protein Bar - Chocolate vs Premier Protein Protein Shake - Chocolate
Compare protein, calories, price, and overall value for CLIF Builder's Protein Bar - Chocolate and Premier Protein Protein Shake - Chocolate before you buy.
CLIF

Protein
20g
Calories
280
Price
$24.99
Protein per $1
0.8g
Pros
- Competitive overall macros for a protein bars option.
Cons
- Less protein per serving: 20g vs 30g.
- Higher calorie count: 280 vs 160.
Premier Protein
Protein
30g
Calories
160
Price
$24.99
Protein per $1
1.2g
Pros
- More protein per serving: 30g vs 20g.
- Lower calorie load: 160 calories vs 280.
- Better value on protein per dollar: 1.2g per $1.
Cons
- There is no major downside in this head-to-head, so the choice comes down to taste and retailer preference.
| Metric | CLIF Builder's Protein Bar - Chocolate | Premier Protein Protein Shake - Chocolate |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 20g | 30gBest |
| Calories | 280 | 160Best |
| Carbs | 30g | 4gBest |
| Fat | 10g | 3gBest |
| Price | $24.99 | $24.99 |
| Protein per $1 | 0.8g | 1.2gBest |
Premier Protein Protein Shake - Chocolate is the stronger overall pick in this matchup.
Premier Protein Protein Shake - Chocolate wins here because it offers more protein per serving (30g vs 20g), a lighter calorie hit (160 vs 280), better protein-per-dollar value (1.2g/$ vs 0.8g/$).
Choose CLIF Builder's Protein Bar - Chocolate if you care more about competitive overall macros for a protein bars option.
Choose Premier Protein Protein Shake - Chocolate if you care more about more protein per serving: 30g vs 20g.
Frequently Asked Questions
Premier Protein Protein Shake - Chocolate has more protein per serving: 30g versus 20g.
Premier Protein Protein Shake - Chocolate is the lighter option at 160 calories, compared with 280 calories for the alternative.
Premier Protein Protein Shake - Chocolate delivers better protein-per-dollar value at about 1.2g per $1.
Premier Protein Protein Shake - Chocolate is the stronger overall pick in this matchup. Premier Protein Protein Shake - Chocolate wins here because it offers more protein per serving (30g vs 20g), a lighter calorie hit (160 vs 280), better protein-per-dollar value (1.2g/$ vs 0.8g/$). They sit in different categories, so format and texture may matter as much as the raw macros.