Product Comparison

Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi vs StarKist Tuna Creations Sweet and Spicy Pouch (2.6 oz - 1 Pack) Wild Caught, High Protein Shelf Stable Seafood, Gluten Free,

Compare protein, calories, price, and overall value for Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi and StarKist Tuna Creations Sweet and Spicy Pouch (2.6 oz - 1 Pack) Wild Caught, High Protein Shelf Stable Seafood, Gluten Free, before you buy.

Bumble Bee

Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi
Verdict Winner
Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi

Protein

22g

Calories

80

Price

Protein per $1

g

tuna snacks

Pros

  • More protein per serving: 22g vs 16g.
  • Lower calorie load: 80 calories vs 90.

Cons

  • There is no major downside in this head-to-head, so the choice comes down to taste and retailer preference.
View Full Product Details

StarKist Tuna

StarKist Tuna Creations Sweet and Spicy Pouch (2.6 oz - 1 Pack) Wild Caught, High Protein Shelf Stable Seafood, Gluten Free,
StarKist Tuna Creations Sweet and Spicy Pouch (2.6 oz - 1 Pack) Wild Caught, High Protein Shelf Stable Seafood, Gluten Free,

Protein

16g

Calories

90

Price

Protein per $1

g

tuna snacks

Pros

  • Competitive overall macros for a tuna snacks option.

Cons

  • Less protein per serving: 16g vs 22g.
  • Higher calorie count: 90 vs 80.
View Full Product Details
Side-by-Side Breakdown
MetricBumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC CertiStarKist Tuna Creations Sweet and Spicy Pouch (2.6 oz - 1 Pack) Wild Caught, High Protein Shelf Stable Seafood, Gluten Free,
Protein22gBest16g
Calories80Best90
Carbs
Fat
Price
Protein per $1
Verdict

Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi is the stronger overall pick in this matchup.

Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi wins here because it offers more protein per serving (22g vs 16g), a lighter calorie hit (80 vs 90).

Choose Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi if you care more about more protein per serving: 22g vs 16g.

Choose StarKist Tuna Creations Sweet and Spicy Pouch (2.6 oz - 1 Pack) Wild Caught, High Protein Shelf Stable Seafood, Gluten Free, if you care more about competitive overall macros for a tuna snacks option.

Frequently Asked Questions

Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi vs StarKist Tuna Creations Sweet and Spicy Pouch (2.6 oz - 1 Pack) Wild Caught, High Protein Shelf Stable Seafood, Gluten Free,: which has more protein?

Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi has more protein per serving: 22g versus 16g.

Which option is better for a lower-calorie snack?

Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi is the lighter option at 80 calories, compared with 90 calories for the alternative.

Which snack gives better protein value for the price?

Price-per-protein value is unclear because one of these products is missing pricing data.

What is the final verdict in this comparison?

Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi is the stronger overall pick in this matchup. Bumble Bee Chunk Light Tuna In Water, 5 oz Cans (Pack of 4) - Wild Caught Skipjack Tuna - 22g Protein Per Serving - MSC Certi wins here because it offers more protein per serving (22g vs 16g), a lighter calorie hit (80 vs 90). Because they are in the same category, this is a direct apples-to-apples comparison.